Welcome to the State Water Resources Control Board Welcome to the California Environmental Protection Agency
Governor's Website Visit the Water Board Members Page
Agendas
My Water Quality
Performance Report

The California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year 2009-10

TARGETS AND RESOURCES: REGION 8 SANTA ANA

Display a PDF version of this page for easy printing
GROUP: TARGETS AND RESOURCES - REGION 8
MEASURE: ALL REGIONAL TARGETS
ALL RESOURCES

 

MEASUREMENTS
INSPECTIONS AND PERMITS

Region 8 Facilities
Regulated
Inspections Permits Issued
(not including revised and rescinded)
Enforcement
Actions
Program
Budget ($)
Staff
(PY)
Program Actual Target % Target Actual Target % Target
NPDES MAJOR 21 23 18 128% 4 3 133% 6 $802,526 9.4
NPDES MINOR
(including general enrollees)
342 102 28 364% 14 5 280%
STORMWATER CONSTRUCTION 676 1,725 600 288% 216 NA NA 45 $1,212,435 14.3
STORMWATER INDUSTRIAL 1,573 129 249 52% 113 NA NA 346
STORMWATER MUNICIPAL 72 5 14 36% 0 NA NA 2
WASTE DISCHARGE
REQUIREMENTS
55 33 32 103% 4 8 50% 4 $279,080 3.1
LAND DISPOSAL 62 99 52 190% 2 7 29% 28 $353,809 3.4
ALL OTHER PROGRAMS 168 32 11 2 $266,865 3.6
TOTAL 2,969 2,148 364 433 $2,914,715 33.8

 

OTHER TARGETS

Region 8 FY 09-10 Actual Target FY 09-10 % TARGET
1 Plan & Assess
# of combinations added/removed from 303(d) list (impaired waters) 66 9 733%
# of Implementation Provisions Adopted - 19 0%
# of pollutant/waterbody combinations addressed - 5 0%
# of SWAMP analyses conducted 156 156 100%
# of SWAMP Site Visits 200 200 100%
# of Total Maximum Daily Loads Adopted - 2 0%
# of Use Attainability Analysis Adopted - 3 0%
# of Water Quality Objectives Adopted - 5 0%
2 Regulate  
# of groundwater cleanup cases moved to remediation or interim remediation 16 35 46%
# of Site Cleanup Program sites projected closed 16 10 160%
# of Underground Storage Tank sites projected closed 10 15 67%
3 Enforcement  
MMP Violations Not Addressed Within 18 Months of Discovery (as of June 30, 2010) 11 -  

 

RESOURCES (INPUTS)

 

 

 

WHAT THE CARD IS SHOWING

Each target card provides a direct comparison of actual outputs for FY 2009-10 to the target estimates established at the outset of the fiscal year. While budgetary and personnel information is not directly aligned with the activities being assessed, it does provide a basis for understanding the relative priority of key programs within each region and across the State. For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. Notably, the data portrayed include entries completed through July 15, 2010 and do not reflect data input after that period. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

WHY THIS CARD IS IMPORTANT

Beginning with FY 2009-10, performance targets were established for certain output measures. Targets are goals that establish measurable levels of performance to be achieved within a specified time period. This card demonstrates how the resources of the region are being deployed to protect water quality. As with any first year effort, the ability to accurately estimate targeted levels of activity is a learning process. For this first year, the Regional Water Boards considered the unique differences and needs within their respective watersheds, their work priorities given available resources, external factors such as furloughs, and prior year outputs.

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

  • Target arrows: Red; less than 85% of target met, yellow, target met between 85% and 100%, green; target met at 100% or above.
  • All other programs include: Timber Harvest, Non point Source, 401 Certification, Tanks, Pretreatment, Recycling and miscellaneous programs (for budget information).
  • Other Programs (budget): miscellaneous programs not included in the above.
  • Permits issued: Does not include rescissions or permit revisions that may have been included in the targets.

REGIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

    NPDES Stormwater
    • The number of construction stormwater inspections were substantially increased to account for the large number of abandoned or foreclosed construction projects.  These projects required inspections to ensure that the properties were not sources of storm water pollution.

    Site Cleanup & Unerground Storage Tank Programs
    • Funding may include Cleanup and Abatement Account project funds that do not contribute to staff resources.

    General
    • The Region redirected resources in several regulatory programs to focus on high-priority enforcement actions.

( Updated 9/20/11 )

 
 

.