The California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year 2010-11

TARGETS AND RESOURCES: REGION 1 NORTH COAST

INSPECTIONS AND PERMITS  - Data last updated on:  September 19, 2011

Region 1 (North Coast)	Facilities Regulated	Facilities Inspected			Permits Issued, Revised and Renewed			Enforcement Actions	Budget	Staff (PY)
Program		Actual	Target	% Target	Actual	Target	% Target
NPDES Major Individual	15	18	14	129%	5	5	100%	8	$417,760	3.7
NPDES Minor Individual	30	17	6	283%	2	9	22%	6
NPDES Minor General Enrollees	15	7	0	NA	0	0	NA	0
Stormwater Construction	189	132	50	264%	76	0	NA	3	$370,312	3.0
Stormwater Industrial	355	52	35	149%	15	0	NA	102
Stormwater Municipal	15	2	2	100%	0	0	NA	0
Waste Discharge to Land, Municipal Waste	94	21	15	140%	1	5	20%	15	$626,488	4.9
Waste Discharge to Land, Industrial Waste	87	5	5	100%	0			0
Waste Discharge to Land, All Other Facilities	158	26	0	NA	0			2
Land Disposal	36	20	15	133%	0	1	0%	0	$233,736	1.8
Timber Harvest/Confined Animal Facilities	734	149	150	99%	0	0	NA	8	$1,848,663	17.3
All Other Programs	677	22			2			6	$765,482	7.8
TOTAL	2,405	471			101			150	$4,262,441	38.5

OTHER TARGETS

Region 1 (North Coast)	Actual FY 10-11	Target FY 10-11	% Target
Plan and Assess
Implementation Provisions Adopted	0	2	0%
Pollutant/Water Body Combinations Addressed	0	0	NA
Total Maximum Daily Loads Adopted	0	0	NA
Use Attainability Analyses Adopted	0	0	NA
Water Quality Objectives Adopted	0	2	0%
SWAMP Analyses Conducted	718	337	213%
SWAMP Site Visits	234	118	198%
Regulate
NPDES Wastewater Major Facilities All Electronic Reports (eSMR)	3	15	20%
Enforcement
Mandatory Minimum Penalty Violations Not Addressed Within 18 Months of Discovery	181	0
Clean Up
New DoD Sites Into Active Remediation	0	0	NA
New SCP Sites Into Active Remediation	13	9	144%
Cleanup Program Sites Projected Closed	20	5	400%
New UST Sites Into Active Remediation	22	15	147%
Underground Storage Tank Sites Projected Closed	32	30	107%

RESOURCES (INPUTS)

WHAT THE CARD IS SHOWING

Each target card provides a direct comparison of actual outputs for FY 2010-11 to the target estimates established at the outset of the fiscal year. While budgetary and personnel information is not directly aligned with the activities being assessed, it does provide a basis for understanding the relative priority of key programs within each region and across the State. For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. Notably, the data portrayed include entries completed through July 27, 2011 and do not reflect data input after that period. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

WHY THIS CARD IS IMPORTANT

Beginning with FY 2009-10, performance targets were established for certain output measures. Targets are goals that establish measurable levels of performance to be achieved within a specified time period. This card demonstrates how the resources of the region are being deployed to protect water quality. In establishing the targets, the Regional Water Boards considered the unique differences and needs within their respective watersheds, their work priorities given available resources, external factors such as furloughs, and prior year outputs.

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

• Target arrows: = Less than 80% of target met
  = Target met between 80% and 90%
  = Target met at 90% or above.
• All other programs include: Timber Harvest, Non point Source, 401 Certification, Tanks, Pretreatment, Recycling and miscellaneous programs (for budget information).
• Other Programs (budget): miscellaneous programs not included in the above.
• Permits issued: Does not include rescissions or permit revisions that may have been included in the targets.
• Target Definitions FY 2010-2011

REGIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

( Page last updated:  9/19/11 )