The California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year 2010-11

TARGETS AND RESOURCES: REGION 8 - SANTA ANA

INSPECTIONS AND PERMITS  - Data last updated on:  09-19-2011 (8:08 AM)

Region 8 (Santa Ana)	Facilities Regulated	Facilities Inspected			Permits Issued, Revised and Renewed			Enforcement Actions	Budget	Staff (PY)
Program		Actual	Target	% Target	Actual	Target	% Target
NPDES Major Individual	21	20	10	200%	0	4	0%	1	$937,228	8.4
NPDES Minor Individual	13	5	3	167%	0	1	0%	0
NPDES Minor General Enrollees	295	105	18	583%	0	0	NA	1
Stormwater Construction	1000	799	600	133%	414	0	NA	379	$1,428,842	13.4
Stormwater Industrial	1566	290	200	145%	91	0	NA	451
Stormwater Municipal	78	26	9	289%	0	0	NA	2
Waste Discharge to Land, Municipal Waste	40	20	10	200%	2	5	40%	10	$321,668	2.6
Waste Discharge to Land, Industrial Waste	19	3	1	300%	0			0
Waste Discharge to Land, All Other Facilities	34	2	0	NA	0			0
Land Disposal	58	53	55	96%	3	6	50%	4	$407,814	3.4
Timber Harvest/Confined Animal Facilities	0	0	0	NA	0	0	NA	0	$0	0.0
All Other Programs	186	9			1			1	$765,435	6.5
TOTAL	3,310	1,332			511			849	$3,860,987	34.3

OTHER TARGETS

Region 8 (Santa Ana)	Actual FY 10-11	Target FY 10-11	% Target
Plan and Assess
Implementation Provisions Adopted	7	22	32%
Pollutant/Water Body Combinations Addressed	0	16	0%
Total Maximum Daily Loads Adopted	0	6	0%
Use Attainability Analyses Adopted	0	3	0%
Water Quality Objectives Adopted	2	6	33%
SWAMP Analyses Conducted	151	164	92%
SWAMP Site Visits	32	38	84%
Regulate
NPDES Wastewater Major Facilities All Electronic Reports (eSMR)	1	21	5%
Enforcement
Mandatory Minimum Penalty Violations Not Addressed Within 18 Months of Discovery	146	0
Clean Up
New DoD Sites Into Active Remediation	8	5	160%
New SCP Sites Into Active Remediation	11	13	85%
Cleanup Program Sites Projected Closed	16	9	178%
New UST Sites Into Active Remediation	8	2	400%
Underground Storage Tank Sites Projected Closed	15	15	100%

RESOURCES (INPUTS)

WHAT THE CARD IS SHOWING

Each target card provides a direct comparison of actual outputs for FY 2009-10 to the target estimates established at the outset of the fiscal year. While budgetary and personnel information is not directly aligned with the activities being assessed, it does provide a basis for understanding the relative priority of key programs within each region and across the State. For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. Notably, the data portrayed include entries completed through July 15, 2010 and do not reflect data input after that period. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

WHY THIS CARD IS IMPORTANT

Beginning with FY 2009-10, performance targets were established for certain output measures. Targets are goals that establish measurable levels of performance to be achieved within a specified time period. This card demonstrates how the resources of the region are being deployed to protect water quality. As with any first year effort, the ability to accurately estimate targeted levels of activity is a learning process. For this first year, the Regional Water Boards considered the unique differences and needs within their respective watersheds, their work priorities given available resources, external factors such as furloughs, and prior year outputs.

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

• Target arrows: = Less than 80% of target met
  = Target met between 80% and 90%
  = Target met at 90% or above.
• All other programs include: Timber Harvest, Non point Source, 401 Certification, Tanks, Pretreatment, Recycling and miscellaneous programs (for budget information).
• Other Programs (budget): miscellaneous programs not included in the above.
• Permits issued: Does not include rescissions or permit revisions that may have been included in the targets
• Target Definitions FY 2010-2011

REGIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

( Page last updated:  9/19/11 )