The California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year 2011-12

TARGETS AND RESOURCES: REGION 1 NORTH COAST

Targets Achieved

INSPECTIONS AND PERMITS  - Data last updated on:  02-14-2013 (3:05 pm)

Region 1 (North Coast) Regional Considerations	Facilities Regulated	Facilities Inspected			Permits Issued, Revised and Renewed			Enforcement (Compliance & Penalty Actions)	Budget	Staff (PY)
Program		Actual	Target	% Target	Actual	Target	% Target
NPDES Major Individual	14	13	14	93%	2	5	40%	5	$408,129	3.7
NPDES Minor Individual	28	7	7	100%	6	7	86%	4
NPDES Minor General Enrollees	14	1	0	NA	0	0	NA	3
Stormwater Construction	140	78	50	156%	58	0	NA	0	$393,565	3.0
Stormwater Industrial	349	43	35	123%	8	0	NA	0
Stormwater Municipal	25	3	2	150%	0	0	NA	0
Waste Discharge to Land, Municipal Waste	93	15	15	100%	4	4	100%	1	$598,943	4.9
Waste Discharge to Land, Industrial Waste	86	8	5	160%	0			1
Waste Discharge to Land, All Other Facilities	91	2	5	40%	0			0
Land Disposal Landfills	20	5	12	42%	1	2	50%	0	$248,459	1.8
Land Disposal All Other	12	7	3	233%	0	1	0%	0	$0	0.0
Timber Harvest	870	202	150	135%	0	0	NA	0	$1,958,453	17.3
Confined Animal Facilities	4	33	0	NA	0	0	NA	0	$0	0.0
All Other Programs	831	41			0			10	$762,500	7.7
TOTAL	2,577	458			79			24	$4,370,049	38.4

OTHER TARGETS

Region 1 (North Coast)	Actual FY 11-12	Target FY 11-12	% Target
Plan and Assess
Implementation Provisions Adopted	0	0	NA
Pollutant/Water Body Combinations Addressed	0	0	NA
Total Maximum Daily Loads Adopted	0	0	NA
Use Attainability Analyses Adopted	0	0	NA
Water Quality Objectives Adopted	0	0	NA
SWAMP Analyses Conducted	1,179	253	466%
SWAMP Site Visits	382	90	424%
Regulate
NPDES Wastewater Major Facilities All Electronic Reports (eSMR)	12	14	86%
Enforcement
Mandatory Minimum Penalty Violations Not Addressed Within 18 Months of Discovery	244	0
Clean Up
New DoD Sites Into Active Remediation	1	0	NA
New SCP Sites Into Active Remediation	9	8	113%
Cleanup Program Sites Projected Closed	18	10	180%
New UST Sites Into Active Remediation	28	15	187%
Underground Storage Tank Sites Projected Closed	39	25	156%

RESOURCES (INPUTS)

WHAT THE CARD IS SHOWING

Each target card provides a direct comparison of actual outputs for FY 2011-12 to the target estimates established at the outset of the fiscal year. While budgetary and personnel information is not directly aligned with the activities being assessed, it does provide a basis for understanding the relative priority of key programs within each region and across the State. For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. Notably, the data portrayed include entries completed through July 27, 2011 and do not reflect data input after that period. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

WHY THIS CARD IS IMPORTANT

Beginning with FY 2009-10, performance targets were established for certain output measures. Targets are goals that establish measurable levels of performance to be achieved within a specified time period. This card demonstrates how the resources of the region are being deployed to protect water quality. In establishing the targets, the Regional Water Boards considered the unique differences and needs within their respective watersheds, their work priorities given available resources, external factors such as furloughs, and prior year outputs.

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

• Target arrows: = Less than 80% of target met
  = Target met between 80% and 90%
  = Target met at 90% or above.
• All other programs include: Timber Harvest, Non point Source, 401 Certification, Tanks, Pretreatment, Recycling and miscellaneous programs (for budget information).
• Other Programs (budget): miscellaneous programs not included in the above.
• Permits issued: Does not include rescissions or permit revisions that may have been included in the targets.
• Target Definitions FY 2011-2012

REGIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

The North Coast Regional Board adopted an additional NPDES permit, for the Willits Environmental Trust, this fiscal year.

( Page last updated:  10/12/12 )