The California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year 2012-13

TARGETS AND RESOURCES: REGION 2 SAN FRANCISCO BAY

Targets Achieved

GROUP:  TARGETS AND RESOURCES - REGION 2

MEASURE: ALL REGIONAL TARGETS ALL RESOURCES

Target arrows: = Less than 80% of target met = Target met between 80% and 90% = Target met at 90% or above

INSPECTIONS AND PERMITS  - Data last updated on:  11-12-2013 (12:17 pm)

Region 2 (San Francisco Bay) Regional Considerations	Facilities Regulated	Facilities Inspected			Permits Issued, Revised and Renewed			Enforcement (Compliance & Penalty Actions)	Budget	Staff (PY)
Program		Actual	Target	% Target	Actual	Target	% Target
NPDES Major Individual	52	26	38	68%	11	13	85%	9	$1,799,068	15.3
NPDES Minor Individual	26	6	0	NA	1	2	50%	5
NPDES Minor General Enrollees	189	2	0	NA	43	0	NA	14
Stormwater Construction	926	59	110	54%	443	0	NA	0	$1,445,069	12.1
Stormwater Industrial	1319	47	110	43%	112	0	NA	0
Stormwater Municipal	109	24	17	141%	0	0	NA	2
Waste Discharge to Land, Municipal Waste	59	1	6	17%	0	9	0%	1	$318,274	2.5
Waste Discharge to Land, Industrial Waste	7	0	1	0%	0			0
Waste Discharge to Land, All Other Facilities	51	0	3	0%	0			2
Land Disposal Landfills	63	41	25	164%	0	2	0%	1	$449,226	3.2
Land Disposal All Other	15	5	5	100%	0	0	NA	6	$0	0.0
Timber Harvest	0	0	0	NA	0	0	NA	0	$0	0.0
Confined Animal Facilities	53	0	0	NA	0	0	NA	0	$0	0.0
All Other Programs	463	15			132			0	$2,635,482	20.3
TOTAL	3,332	226			742			40	$6,647,119	53.4

OTHER TARGETS

Region 2 (San Francisco Bay)	Actual FY 12-13	Target FY 12-13	% Target
Plan and Assess
Pollutant/Water Body Combinations Addressed	2	3	67%
Total Maximum Daily Loads Adopted	1	2	50%
Use Attainability Analyses Adopted	0	0	NA
Water Quality Objectives Adopted	0	2	0%
% of SWAMP Data Available Within 2 Years of Collection	100	95	105%
% of SWAMP Data Available Within 1 Year of Collection	19	50	38%
Regulate
NPDES Wastewater Major Facilities All Electronic Reports (eSMR)	48	54	89%
Enforcement
Mandatory Minimum Penalty Violations Not Addressed Within 18 Months of Discovery	30	0
% of Class 1 Priority Violations With Formal Enforcement Within 18 Months of Discovery	67	100	67%
Clean Up
New DoD Sites Into Active Remediation	11	5	220%
New SCP Sites Into Active Remediation	13	10	130%
Cleanup Program Sites Projected Closed	30	30	100%
New UST Sites Into Active Remediation	14	10	140%
Underground Storage Tank Sites Projected Closed	35	30	117%

RESOURCES (INPUTS)

WHAT THE CARD IS SHOWING

Each target card provides a direct comparison of actual outputs for FY 2012-13 to the target estimates established at the outset of the fiscal year. While budgetary and personnel information is not directly aligned with the activities being assessed, it does provide a basis for understanding the relative priority of key programs within each region and across the State. For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. Notably, the data portrayed include entries completed through July 27, 2011 and do not reflect data input after that period. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

WHY THIS CARD IS IMPORTANT

Beginning with FY 2009-10, performance targets were established for certain output measures. Targets are goals that establish measurable levels of performance to be achieved within a specified time period. This card demonstrates how the resources of the region are being deployed to protect water quality. In establishing the targets, the Regional Water Boards considered the unique differences and needs within their respective watersheds, their work priorities given available resources, external factors such as furloughs, and prior year outputs.

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

• Target arrows: = Less than 80% of target met
  = Target met between 80% and 90%
  = Target met at 90% or above.
• All other programs include: Timber Harvest, Non point Source, 401 Certification, Tanks, Pretreatment, Recycling and miscellaneous programs (for budget information).
• Other Programs (budget): miscellaneous programs not included in the above.
• Permits issued: Does not include rescissions or permit revisions that may have been included in the targets.
• Target Definitions FY 2011-2012

REGIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

No Regional Considerations Provided.

( Page last updated:  9/17/13 )