

![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year 2012-13
TARGETS AND RESOURCES: STATE BOARD |
![]() |
GROUP: STATE BOARD | MEASURE: TARGETS FY 2012-2013 | Target arrows: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
OTHER TARGETS
State Board | Actual FY 12-13 |
Target FY 12-13 |
% Target |
---|---|---|---|
Fund | |||
Underground Storage Tank 5-Year Reviews Completed | 387 | 1,250 | ![]() |
Underground Storage Tanks Sites Closed with Claim Closure | 423 | 400 | ![]() |
Underground Storage Tank Fund Income to Expenditure Ratio | 1 | 1 | ![]() |
Underground Storage Tank Fund % Overhead Rate | 4 | 10 | ![]() |
% of State Revolving Fund Loans Processed in Less than 9 Months | 34 | 95 | ![]() |
% of State Revolving Fund Disbursements Processed in Less than 30 Days | 82 | 100 | ![]() |
Water Quality Monitoring- Swamp Statewide Assessments | |||
State Board Bioaccumulation Oversight Group. Number of of Analyses | 0 | 0 | |
State Board Stream Pollution Trends. Number of Analyses | 189 | 0 | |
State Board Perennial Stream Assessment. Number of Analyses | 383 | 0 | |
State Board Reference Condition Management Program. Number of Analyses | 235 | 0 | |
State Board Bioaccumulation Oversight Group. Number of Site Visits | 0 | 0 | |
State Board Stream Pollution Trends. Number of Site Visits | 64 | 0 | |
State Board Perennial Stream Assessment. Number of Site Visits | 77 | 0 | |
State Board Reference Condition Management Program. Number of Site Visits | 47 | 0 | |
Water Rights | |||
FERC Project Certifications Issued | 1 | 8 | ![]() |
Non-FERC Project Certifications Issued | 6 | 4 | ![]() |
Resolve License Issues for Existing Permits | 26 | 20 | ![]() |
Water Rights Permits Issued | 24 | 24 | ![]() |
Water Right Petitions Issued | 89 | 36 | ![]() |
Water Rights Temporary Urgency Permits Issued | 2 | 1 | ![]() |
Plan and Assess | |||
Policies Adopted or Amended | 5 | 9 | ![]() |
Number of Wells Sampled | 150 | 150 | ![]() |
Number of Groundwater Reports Published | 5 | 5 | ![]() |
Regulate | |||
NPDES Permits Adopted | 3 | 4 | ![]() |
Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) General Orders Adopted or Amended | 1 | 3 | ![]() |
Enforcement | |||
File Reviews for Government-owned and/or Operated UST Facilities | 225 | 200 | ![]() |
Inspections of Government-owned and/or Operated UST Facilities | 43 | 30 | ![]() |
Enforcement Actions on Government-owned and/or Operated UST Facilities | 3 | 20 | ![]() |
Facilities with Backlogged MMP Violations Resolved with ACL Actions | 131 | 261 | ![]() |
RESOURCES (INPUTS)
State Board | FY 12-13 Budget ($) |
Staff (PY) | %Fees/Taxes Penalties |
%Federal | %General Fund/Other |
%Bonds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Planning | $5,255,572 | 30.0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Basin Planning | $5,182,761 | 29.3 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Total Maximum Daily Load | $72,811 | 0.7 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
Monitoring | $11,326,394 | 15.5 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Water Quality Monitoring (SWAMP/GAMA) | $11,326,394 | 15.5 | 53% | 47% | 0% | 0% |
Regulate | $13,226,630 | 83.5 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
401 Certification/Wetlands | $200,773 | 2.0 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Confined Animal Facilities | $300,000 | 0.0 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Department of Defense/Navy Cost Recovery | $761,605 | 5.1 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Enforcement Coordination | $1,428,292 | 10.4 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Forest Activities/Timber Harvest Plans | $47,723 | 0.4 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Irrigated Lands | $87,076 | 0.7 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Land Disposal/Landfills | $1,384,221 | 7.6 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Nonpoint Source | $625,513 | 6.5 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
NPDES | $2,602,564 | 18.6 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Other Programs (miscellaneous programs not included in the above) | $419,494 | 3.3 | 18% | 16% | 56% | 10% |
Stormwater | $2,345,474 | 14.9 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Waste Discharge to Land | $3,023,895 | 14.0 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Watershed Initiative | $0 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Clean Up | $18,996,858 | 38.4 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup | $837,640 | 5.2 | 99% | 0% | 1% | 0% |
Underground Storage Tanks | $18,159,218 | 33.2 | 95% | 5% | 0% | 0% |
Fund | $536,132,943 | 129.7 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Bond Programs (State Operations/Staff) | $8,205,854 | 60.0 | 3% | 0% | 14% | 83% |
Clean Up and Abatement Account | $17,404,126 | 4.0 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Local Assistance Funding | $230,382,000 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Underground Storage Tank Claim Payments | $7,216,055 | 65.7 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
UST Claim Payments Funds | $272,924,908 | 0.0 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Water Rights | $12,796,729 | 107.3 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Water Rights Program | $12,796,729 | 107.3 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Administration | $37,680,275 | 132.0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Division of Administrative Services | $11,860,099 | 104.0 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Division of Information Technology | $4,436,029 | 28.0 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Operating Expenses and Equipment (includes Facility Operations) | $21,384,147 | 0.0 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Management and Support | $18,914,272 | 134.5 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Chief Counsel Support to Programs | $5,991,444 | 35.0 | 18% | 16% | 56% | 10% |
Executive Office | $2,225,426 | 16.0 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Management/Administration | $4,202,603 | 28.1 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Office of Chief Counsel | $608,360 | 4.4 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Office of Information Management and Analysis | $2,639,167 | 23.0 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Office of Legislation and Public Affairs | $1,725,824 | 16.0 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
Office of Research, Planning and Performance | $1,521,448 | 12.0 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
State Board Total | $654,329,673 | 670.9 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
STATE BOARD EXPLANATIONS
Five Years Review Completed: In August 2012 the State Board adopted Resolution No. 2012-0062, which required UST Cleanup Fund staff to evaluate approximately 555 cases for closure under the Low Threat Closure Policy criteria, a new and unanticipated workload. These 555 cases had previously been recommended for closure as part of a routine 5-year review. These Low Threat Closure Policy Reviews are two to three times more labor intensive than the routine 5-Year Reviews. Consequently, fewer of them were performed during the reporting timeframe.