The California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year 2013-14
ENFORCE: NPDES WASTEWATER
GROUP:
MINOR NPDES FACILITIES
MEASURE: COMPLIANCE RATES-2013
MESSAGE:
The Regional Boards documented one or more violations for 57% of facilities in calendar year 2013. 66 NPDES Minor facilities incurred a high priority violation.
KEY STATISTICS FOR YEAR 2013
Percentage of Facilities with One or More Violations:
57%
Facilities with Violations:
130
Documented Violations:
1,301
MEASUREMENTS
- Data last updated on:
10-17-2014 (11:31 am)
Region
Regulated
Facilities
No. of Facs. With Compliance Assessed
Facs. with No Violations
No. of Facilities with 1-10 Violations
No. of Facilities with 11-25 Violations
No. of Facilities with > 25 Violations
No. of Facilities with Violations
Number of Violations
Percentage of Facilities in Violation
Average No. of Violations per Facility in Violation
1
28
28
14
8
3
3
14
262
50%
18.7
2
34
24
20
4
0
0
4
9
17%
2.3
3
15
15
6
9
0
0
9
29
60%
3.2
4
48
48
12
33
3
0
36
140
75%
3.9
5F
13
13
6
6
1
0
7
46
54%
6.6
5R
33
33
16
13
2
2
17
228
52%
13.4
5S
35
35
9
14
6
6
26
433
74%
16.7
6A
5
5
4
1
0
0
1
1
20%
1.0
6B
4
4
1
3
0
0
3
10
75%
3.3
7
11
11
2
7
0
2
9
130
82%
14.4
8
8
8
7
1
0
0
1
3
13%
3.0
9
5
5
2
3
0
0
3
10
60%
3.3
TOTAL
239
229
99
102
15
13
130
1,301
57%
10
Region
No. of Facs. With Compliance Assessed
Facs. with Priority I Violations
Priority I Violations
Facs. with Priority II Violations
Priority II Violations
Facs. with Priority III Violations
Priority III Violations
Facs. with Priority Violations Un-determined
Priority Violations Un-determined
Percentage of Facilities with Priority Violations
1
28
1
4
1
2
3
10
13
246
7%
2
24
0
0
1
5
2
2
2
2
4%
3
15
0
0
5
16
6
12
1
1
33%
4
48
0
0
21
70
30
70
0
0
44%
5F
13
0
0
4
4
0
0
7
42
31%
5R
33
0
0
8
58
12
92
8
78
24%
5S
35
1
1
21
361
11
35
5
36
60%
6A
5
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
20%
6B
4
0
0
2
8
1
1
1
1
50%
7
11
0
0
2
39
0
0
9
91
18%
8
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
0%
9
5
0
0
0
0
3
7
1
3
0%
TOTAL
229
2
5
66
564
68
229
48
503
29%
WHAT THE MEASURE IS SHOWING
The Regional Boards documented one or more violations for 57 percent of facilities with compliance assessed in calendar year 2013. A large percentage of violations (38%) are pending classification for priority for enforcement.
WHY THIS MEASURE IS IMPORTANT
The mission of compliance and enforcement programs is to ensure that compliance with the laws and regulations is achieved and maintained over time. Compliance rates inform the public about efforts of the regulated community and the work of government agencies. Compliance rates assist managers to describe and identify noncompliance problems in magnitude, frequency and duration and also help the evaluation of the enforcement program effectiveness.
Compliance rates provide valuable insight into programs, but it is important to understand variables influencing the rate. Rates can vary depending on inspection protocols and methodology (whether inspections are announced or unannounced, targeted on problem facilities, etc.). How rates are calculated and what data are included (or excluded) are equally important. For example, including all violations in the calculation gives a very different rate than just including significant violations. These variables need to be understood when the rate is used and included with any presentation. While not a perfect measure, compliance rates are considered an outcome measure for the enforcement program and are more constructive than relying on activity and output counts alone. Reporting compliance rates is required in section 13225 (e) of the California Water Code and is identified in the 2010 water quality enforcement policy as one of the 9 key recommended performance measure for Water Boards’ enforcement programs.
TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Data Source: CIWQS. Period: January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013.
Unit of Measure: Number facilities evaluated with one or more violations.
Data Definitions: Violations include any documented violation and are prioritized based on the enforcement policy. Data is reported on a calendar basis partially because the lag between a violation is detected and is reported and documented but also to align with the CALEPA enforcement report and other mandated reports (See section 13325 (e) of California Water Code).
The number of facilities with one or more documented violation during the reporting period divided by the total number of facilities for which compliance has been assessed.
Compliance Assessment
Compliance assessment is any activity conducted by Water Board staff, USEPA, or contractors working for the Water Boards that evaluates the compliance with requirements established by Water Boards actions. Compliance activities mainly include reviewing self-monitoring reports submitted by dischargers and inspections of the facilities and/or operations of the regulated community.
Class I Priority Violations
Class I priority violations are those violations that pose an immediate and substantial threat to water quality and that have the potential to cause significant detrimental impacts to human health or the environment. Violations involving recalcitrant parties who deliberately avoid compliance with water quality regulations and orders are also considered class I priority violations because they pose a serious threat to the integrity of the Water Boards’ regulatory programs.
Class II Priority Violations
Class II priority violations are those violations that pose a moderate, indirect, or cumulative threat to water quality and, therefore, have the potential to cause detrimental impacts on human health and the environment. Negligent or inadvertent noncompliance with water quality regulations that has the potential for causing or allowing the continuation of an unauthorized discharge or obscuring past violations is also a class II priority violation.
Class III Priority Violations
Class III priority violations are those violations that pose only a minor threat to water quality and have little or no known potential for causing a detrimental impact on human health and the environment. Class III priority violations include statutorily required liability for late reporting when such late filings do not result in causing an unauthorized discharge or allowing one to continue. Class III priority violations should only include violations by dischargers who are first time or infrequent violators and are not part of a pattern of chronic violations. Class III priority violations are all violations that are not class I priority or class II priority violations.
Minor Facility
A minor facility is a discharge with a design flow of less than one million gallons per day (MGD) that has not been determined to have an actual or potential adverse environmental impact classifying the discharge as Major. Minor facilities regulated under the NPDES program can be enrolled in a general permit or regulated with an individual NPDES permit.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
The NPDES permit program (Section 402 of the Clean Water Act ) controls water pollution by regulating point sources that discharge pollutants into waters of the United States. Point sources are discrete conveyances such as pipes or man-made ditches. Individual homes that are connected to a municipal system, use a septic system, or do not have a surface discharge do not need an NPDES permit; however, industrial, municipal, and other facilities must obtain permits if their discharges go directly to surface waters. US EPA has approved the Water Board’s program to issue NPDES permits.