1980 WATER QUALITY ORDERS
All
orders adopted by the Board are precedential with
the exception of those that specifically state the
contrary. Orders signed by an individual, for example
by the Executive Director, are not precedential and
are denoted by an asterisk (*).
Precedential
orders provide guidance for later decisions and orders.
The Board and the nine Regional Water Quality Control
Boards (Regional Boards) ordinarily will follow State
Board precedents, or provide a reasoned analysis for
not doing so. Administrative precedents do not have
the same binding effect as statutes or administrative
regulations, however. The Board may refine, reformulate
or even reverse its precedents on a case-by-case basis
in light of new insights or changed circumstances.
A Regional Board cannot reverse a State Board precedent,
but a Regional Board may distinguish a State Board
precedent. A Regional Board may conclude that based
on differences between the facts before the Regional
Board and the facts that were the basis for the State
Board precedent, a State Board precedent either does
not apply or should be modified as applied in the
proceeding before the Regional Board.
WQ ORDER NO. |
DATE OF MEETING |
SUBJECT |
1/24/80 |
In the Matter of the Petition of the Department of Fish and Game for Riview of Action of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region, Regarding Discharge of Wastewater by Pacific Mine to the North Fork of the Middle Fork of the American River. Our File No. A-237. |
|
2/21/80 |
In the Matter of the Petition of the City of Pacific Grove for Review of Order No. 79-68 (NPDES Permit No. CA0048178), California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Coast Region. Our File No. A-243. | |
2/21/80 |
In the Matter of the Petition of John Korelich for Review of Order No. 79-77 of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Coast Region. Our File No. A-248. | |
3/20/80 |
In the Matter of the Petition of Aerojet General Corporation and Cordova Chemical Company for Review of Orders Nos. 79-196, 79-197, 79-198, 79-200, 79-201 and 79-202 of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region. Our File No. A-252. | |
3/20/80 |
In the Matter of the Petition of the Sierra Club for Review of Orders Nos. 79-04 and 79-27 of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Coast Region. Our File No. A-236. | |
3/20/80 |
In the Matter of the Petition of the Cities of San Jose and Santa Clara for Review of Cease and Desist Order No. 79-147 of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region. Our File No. A-256. | |
5/29/1979 |
In the Matter of the Petition of the County of San Diego for Review of Inaction of San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Regarding Implementation of Water Reclamation Goals. Our File No. A-231. | |
4/17/80 |
In the Matter of the Petition of Concerned Citizens for Agriculture in Sonoma County for a Stay and Review of Resolution No. 79-15 and Order No. 79-196 of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region. Our File No. A-255. | |
4/17/80 |
In the Matter of the Appeal by Ronald K. S. Linden from Denial of His Application and Invalidation of His Operator Certification Examination. | |
5/15/80 |
In the Matter of the Petitions of Contra Costa County Sanitation District No. 7-A for Review of Final Decisions of the Division of Water Quality Regarding Grant Eligibility. Our Files Nos. G-45, G-50, G-51 and G-52. | |
5/15/80 |
In the Matter of the Petitions of the Las Virgenes Municipal Water District, Advocates for Balanced California Development, Inc. Monte Nido Valley Property Owners Association, and Laurence H. Frommhagen for Review and Stay of Order No. 80-9 of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region. Our Files Nos. A-264, 266, 267, and 268. | |
6/19/80 |
In the Matter of the Petitions of Lloyd Walker, Walker & Sons Custom Chrome, Inc. and Clifford R. Conroy for Review of March 11, 1980 Cleanup and Abatement Order of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region. Our File No. A-270. | |
7/17/80 |
In the Matter of the Petition of Marina County Water District for Review of Failure to Act by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Coast Region. Our File No. A-235(B). | |
8/21/80 |
In the Matter of the Petition of Stuart Lessmueller for Review of Denial of Exemption from Waste Discharge Prohibition by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. Our File No. A-232. | |
9/18/80 |
In the Matter of the Petition of Aerojet General Corporation and Cordova Chemical Company for Review of Orders Nos. 79-258, 79-259, and 79-260, of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region. Our File No. A-260. | |
9/18/80 |
In the Matter of the Petition of Rice Road Land Reclamation Company for Review of Order No. 80-017 of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region. Our File No. A-262. | |
N/A |
N/A – No such order was adopted. | |
10/16/80 |
In the Matter of the Petition of the County of San Diego for Review of the Final Decision of the Division of Water Quality Regarding Grant Eligibility of Flood Control Facilities, Project No. C-06-1097. | |
11/20/80 |
In the Matter of the Petitions of the Las Virgenes Municipal Water District, Advocates for Balanced California Development, Inc., Monte Nido Valley Property Owners Association, and Laurence H. Frommhagen for Review of Order No. 80-9 of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region. Our files Nos. A-264, 266, 267, and 268. | |
11/20/80 |
In the Matter of the Petition of Concerned Citizens for Agriculture in Sonoma County for Review of Resolution No. 79-15 and Order No. 79-169 of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region. Our File No. A-255. | |
11/20/80 |
In the Matter of the Request for Stay of Order No. 80-35, Waste Discharge Requirements for Improvement District No. 58 of the Coachella Valley Water District by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin. Our File No. A-274. | |
11/20/80 |
In the Matter of the Petition of Laguna Hills Sanitation, Inc., for Review of Order No. 80-84 of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. Our File No. A-276. | |
12/18/80 |
In the Matter of Review of Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board Order No. 6-80-73, Regarding Waste Discharge Requirements for Tahoe City Public Utility District and the State Department of Parks and Recreation for Star Harbor Athletic Field. Our File No. A-282. |