| Water Body Name: | Hole Lake |
| Water Body ID: | CAL8012600020080922112714 |
| Water Body Type: | Lake & Reservoir |
DECISION ID |
76401 |
Region 8 |
Hole Lake |
||
| Pollutant: | pH |
| Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: | Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016) |
| Revision Status | Original |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: | Pollutant |
| Regional Board Conclusion: | There was no new data considered in the 2014 Listing Cycle, this previously made decision will carryover. The following description applies to an earlier Listing Cycle.
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One (1) line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Four of the samples exceed the water quality objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Four (4) of seventy-five (75) samples exceeded the Basin Plan Objective and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: | This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current. The decision has not changed. |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: | |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: | After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
|
|||||
| LOE ID: | 25917 | ||||
| Pollutant: | pH | ||||
| LOE Subgroup: | Pollutant-Water | ||||
| Matrix: | Water | ||||
| Fraction: | None | ||||
| Beneficial Use: | Warm Freshwater Habitat | ||||
| Number of Samples: | 75 | ||||
| Number of Exceedances: | 4 | ||||
| Data and Information Type: | PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING | ||||
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: | Of the 4 samples collected, 75 exceeded the Basin Plan's Objective. This data was compiled by Wildermouth Environmental Services on behalf of the dischargers to the Santa Ana River Watershed. | ||||
| Data Reference: | 2006 HCMP Database | ||||
| SWAMP Data: | Non-SWAMP | ||||
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: | Santa Ana Region Basin Plan: pH - 6.5 units to 8.5 units | ||||
| Objective/Criterion Reference: | Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin | ||||
| Evaluation Guideline: | |||||
| Guideline Reference: | |||||
| Spatial Representation: | The samples were taken at one location, the outlet, in Hole Lake. | ||||
| Temporal Representation: | The samples were collected on: 7/2/2003, 8/6/2003, 9/4/2003, 9/11/2003, 1/26/2004, 2/11/2004, 4/15/2004, 5/19/2004, 6/2/2004, 6/15/2004, 7/13/2004, 7/28/2004, 8/12/2004, 8/23/2004, 9/7/2004, 9/21/2004, 10/6/2004, 10/21/2004, 11/4/2004, 11/17/2004, 12/2/2004, 12/14/2004, 1/26/2005, 2/9/2005, 3/3/2005, 3/17/2005, 3/30/2005, 4/15/2005, 4/27/2005, 5/11/2005, 5/24/2005, 6/6/2005, 6/29/2005, 7/13/2005, 7/28/2005, 8/10/2005, 8/24/2005, 9/7/2005, 9/21/2005, 10/5/2005, 10/20/2005, 11/2/2005, 11/16/2005, 12/1/2005, 12/15/2005, 1/12/2006, 1/30/2006, 2/8/2006, 2/22/2006, 3/9/2006, 3/23/2006, 4/5/2006, 4/24/2006, 5/5/2006, 5/17/2006, 6/2/2006, 6/14/2006, 6/28/2006, 7/12/2006, 7/26/2006, 8/9/2006, 8/23/2006, 9/6/2006, 9/20/2006, 10/4/2006, 10/18/2006, 11/1/2006, 11/15/2006, 11/29/2006, 12/13/2006, 12/27/2006, 1/10/2007, 1/24/2007, 2/7/2007, 2/21/2007 | ||||
| Environmental Conditions: | The samples were taken during the wet and dry season. | ||||
| QAPP Information: | The data's quality is deemed acceptable because it was submitted by an NPDES discharger in accordance with its Monitoring and Reporting Requirements. | ||||
| QAPP Information Reference(s): | |||||