Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278311 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON300 (Sonoma Creek below Adobe Cyn. Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-10 and 2012-09-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278272 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON320 (Sonoma Creek above tent park near white barn (headwaters)). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-01 and 2012-08-13 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278749 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-13 and 2012-08-28 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278748 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON260 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12 near Hoff St). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-30 and 2012-09-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
277790 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-13 and 2012-08-28 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278268 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON300 (Sonoma Creek below Adobe Cyn. Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-10 and 2012-09-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278291 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON019 (Sonoma Creek downstream of W. Watmaugh Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-14 and 2012-08-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
279208 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-08 and 2012-08-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
279895 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON300 (Sonoma Creek below Adobe Cyn. Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-09-05 and 2012-09-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
279921 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON260 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12 near Hoff St). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-09-06 and 2012-09-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
279331 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON019 (Sonoma Creek downstream of W. Watmaugh Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-23 and 2012-08-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
279090 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON320 (Sonoma Creek above tent park near white barn (headwaters)). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-13 and 2012-08-13 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
279350 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON260 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12 near Hoff St). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-09-06 and 2012-09-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278469 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-07 and 2012-08-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278271 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON260 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12 near Hoff St). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-30 and 2012-09-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278270 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-12 and 2012-08-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
277500 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON320 (Sonoma Creek above tent park near white barn (headwaters)). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-01 and 2012-08-13 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278312 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-12 and 2012-08-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
277768 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-06 and 2012-08-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
277502 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-06 and 2012-08-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
277574 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-07 and 2012-08-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
277501 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON019 (Sonoma Creek downstream of W. Watmaugh Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-14 and 2012-08-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
279437 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-22 and 2012-08-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
279838 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON019 (Sonoma Creek downstream of W. Watmaugh Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-23 and 2012-08-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
279455 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-28 and 2012-08-28 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
279562 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-08 and 2012-08-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
279036 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-22 and 2012-08-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
279311 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON300 (Sonoma Creek below Adobe Cyn. Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-09-05 and 2012-09-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
279205 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-29 and 2012-08-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
279033 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-29 and 2012-08-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
279646 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON320 (Sonoma Creek above tent park near white barn (headwaters)). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-13 and 2012-08-13 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151020, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278828 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-28 and 2012-08-28 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143391, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
276719 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-28 and 2012-08-28 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143391, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
276696 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-08 and 2012-08-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143391, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, ncords/region_2/2021/ref5525.pdf" >Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285857 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
15 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 15 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON180 (Sonoma Creek at 3910 Warm Springs Road, Glen Ellen 95442). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-06-14 and 2018-07-03 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285985 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
34 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 34 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ don-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
276697 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-08 and 2012-08-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143391, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
276715 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-08-03 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286244 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS001 (Fisher Creek Tributary upstream of Sonoma Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
| top" width="33%">Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-22 and 2012-08-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143391, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
277443 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON260 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12 near Hoff St). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-09-06 and 2012-09-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Inform Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286257 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS003 (Fisher Creek S. Branch). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286499 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
39 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
6 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 6 of 39 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143391, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
276677 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON320 (Sonoma Creek above tent park near white barn (headwaters)). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-13 and 2012-08-13 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143391, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
276695 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32b (Sonoma Creek at USGS Gage 11458433). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-08-03 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286501 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
32 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 32 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON020 (Sonoma Creek @ Watmaugh Road Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-08-03 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285814 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON300 (Sonoma Creek below Adobe Cyn. Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-10 and 2012-09-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286064 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS002 (Fisher Creek at Warm Springs Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-29 and 2012-08-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143391, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
277455 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
| Guidelineign="left" valign="top" width="67%">The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286439 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON300 (Sonoma Creek below Adobe Cyn. Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-10 and 2012-09-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285724 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-22 and 2012-08-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143391, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
276676 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON300 (Sonoma Creek below Adobe Cyn. Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-09-05 and 2012-09-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143391, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON215 (Sonoma Creek at Lawndale Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285607 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
18 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 18 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONCYP (Sonoma Creek at Cypress Ave). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-06-14 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean SPADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; WIDTH: 100%; text-align: left; PADDING-TOP: 3px; font-smooth: always">Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
276675 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON019 (Sonoma Creek downstream of W. Watmaugh Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-23 and 2012-08-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143391, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
276718 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285775 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
3 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206KEN001 (Kenwood Creek upstream of confluence with Sonoma Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286409 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON320 (Sonoma Creek above tent park near white barn (headwaters)). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-01 and 2012-08-13 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285921 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON260 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12 near Hoff St). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-30 and 2012-09-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON300 (Sonoma Creek below Adobe Cyn. Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-09-05 and 2012-09-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143391, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
276735 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON019 (Sonoma Creek downstream of W. Watmaugh Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-23 and 2012-08-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requiremONT-WEIGHT: bold; PADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; WIDTH: 100%; text-align: right; PADDING-TOP: 3px; font-smooth: always">Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286429 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
6 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON019 (Sonoma Creek downstream of W. Watmaugh Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-14 and 2012-08-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285953 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water ents were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143391, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
276698 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-29 and 2012-08-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143391, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
276716 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samplhabitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS003 (Fisher Creek S. Branch). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285859 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON205 (Sonoma Creek upstream of Warm Springs West confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286500 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
| 1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON260 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12 near Hoff St). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-09-06 and 2012-09-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143391, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
276674 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-28 and 2012-08-28 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143391, Alkalinity as CaCO3
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
276717 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Alkalinity as CaCO3 |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Alkalinity as CaCO3. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA recommended alkalinity criterion continuous concentration (CCC) for the protection of aquatic life in freshwater is a minimum value of 20,000 ug/L (4-day average). |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON320 (Sonoma Creek above tent park near white barn (headwaters)). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-13 and 2012-08-13 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
valign="top" width="67%">Oxygen, Dissolved
| |
DECISION ID |
143392 |
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143392, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283376 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for cyfluthrin is 0.2 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of cyfluthrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Cyfluthrin |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-11-16 to 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143392, Cyfluthrin
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283312 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cyfluthrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cyfluthrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for cyfluthrin is 0.2 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of cyfluthrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Cyfluthrin |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-11-16 to 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
r> |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON215 (Sonoma Creek at Lawndale Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288747 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON320 (Sonoma Creek above tent park near white barn (headwaters)). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-01 and 2012-08-13 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288684 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
7 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-06 and 2012-09-26 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289070 |
| |
|
|
| |
DECISION ID |
143394 |
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143394, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
284323 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Lambda-cyhalothrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for lambda-cyhalothrin is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of lambda-cyhalothrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Lambda-cyhalothrin |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-11-16 to 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143394, Cyhalothrin, Lambda
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
284424 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cyhalothrin, Lambda |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Lambda-cyhalothrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for lambda-cyhalothrin is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of lambda-cyhalothrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Lambda-cyhalothrin |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-11-16 to 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
"left" valign="top" width="33%">Pollutant:
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
33 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 33 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON020 (Sonoma Creek @ Watmaugh Road Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-20 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298703 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS003 (Fisher Creek S. Branch). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298798 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-12 and 2012-10-18 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298532 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
Water Quali
| |
DECISION ID |
143390 |
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143390, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283557 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for cypermethrin is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of cypermethrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Cypermethrin |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-11-16 to 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143390, Cypermethrin
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283610 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for cypermethrin is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of cypermethrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Cypermethrin |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-11-16 to 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
ty Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONTON (Sonoma Creek near Tonelee Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298819 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
9 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON180 (Sonoma Creek at 3910 Warm Springs Road, Glen Ellen 95442). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-06-21 and 2018-07-03 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298799 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2)
|
| |
DECISION ID |
143393 |
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143393, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283597 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.000026 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic). |
| Guideline Reference: |
OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-11-16 to 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143393, Deltamethrin
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283757 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Deltamethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Deltamethrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for deltamethrin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.000026 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic). |
| Guideline Reference: |
OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-11-16 to 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
d>
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON300 (Sonoma Creek below Adobe Cyn. Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-10 and 2012-09-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298589 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
6 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON019 (Sonoma Creek downstream of W. Watmaugh Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-14 and 2012-08-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298736 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
6 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-09 and 2012-09-26 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298876 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA
| |
DECISION ID |
143396 |
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143396, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283497 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Esfenvalerate. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for esfenvalerate is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of esfenvalerate were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Esfenvalerate |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-11-16 to 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143396, Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283477 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Esfenvalerate/Fenvalerate |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Esfenvalerate. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for esfenvalerate is 0.3 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of esfenvalerate were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Esfenvalerate |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-11-16 to 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON320 (Sonoma Creek above tent park near white barn (headwaters)). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-01 and 2012-08-13 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298910 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
22 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 22 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298635 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
20 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 20 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
DECISION ID |
143395 |
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fenpropathrin |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143395, Fenpropathrin
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283688 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fenpropathrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fenpropathrin. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for Fenpropathrin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.0015 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic). |
| Guideline Reference: |
OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-23 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143395, Fenpropathrin
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283690 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fenpropathrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fenpropathrin. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for Fenpropathrin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.0015 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic). |
| Guideline Reference: |
OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-23 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
s/region_2/2022/ref5789.pdf" >Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON020 (Sonoma Creek @ Watmaugh Road Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298601 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
7 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-13 and 2012-09-26 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298605 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210b (Sonoma Creek just upstream of Fisher Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples w
| |
DECISION ID |
143388 |
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fipronil |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143388, Fipronil
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283938 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fipronil |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fipronil. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
UC Davis Aquatic Life Criteria: Aquatic life should not be affected unacceptably if the four-day average concentration of fipronil does not exceed 0.0032 ug/L (3.2 ng/L) in the water column more than once every three years on average (Bower, et al. 2017). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water and Sediment Quality Criteria Report for Fipronil. Phase III: Application of the pesticide water and sediment quality criteria methodologies. Department of Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Davis. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-16 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143388, Fipronil
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283876 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fipronil |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fipronil. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
UC Davis Aquatic Life Criteria: Aquatic life should not be affected unacceptably if the four-day average concentration of fipronil does not exceed 0.0032 ug/L (3.2 ng/L) in the water column more than once every three years on average (Bower, et al. 2017). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water and Sediment Quality Criteria Report for Fipronil. Phase III: Application of the pesticide water and sediment quality criteria methodologies. Department of Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Davis. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-16 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
ere collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298606 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FRE001 (Frey Tributary just upstream of Sonoma Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
|
|
| |
DECISION ID |
143379 |
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fipronil Desulfinyl |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143379, Fipronil Desulfinyl
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283818 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fipronil Desulfinyl |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fipronil Desulfinyl. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for fipronil degradate fipronil desulfinyl is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.54 ug/L for a fish (chronic). |
| Guideline Reference: |
OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-16 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143379, Fipronil Desulfinyl
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
284020 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fipronil Desulfinyl |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fipronil Desulfinyl. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for fipronil degradate fipronil desulfinyl is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.54 ug/L for a fish (chronic). |
| Guideline Reference: |
OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-16 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
n="top" width="33%">QAPP Information Reference(s):
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298789 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-07 and 2012-08-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298529 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON260 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12 near Hoff St). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-30 and 2012-09-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298820 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON215 (Sonoma Creek at Lawndale Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298658 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS002 (Fisher Creek at Warm Springs Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298535 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
|
| |
DECISION ID |
143397 |
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fipronil Sulfide |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143397, Fipronil Sulfide
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
284005 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fipronil Sulfide |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fipronil Sulfide. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for fipronil degradate fipronil sulfide is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.83 ug/L for a fish (chronic). |
| Guideline Reference: |
OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-16 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143397, Fipronil Sulfide
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
284004 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fipronil Sulfide |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fipronil Sulfide. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for fipronil degradate fipronil sulfide is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.83 ug/L for a fish (chronic). |
| Guideline Reference: |
OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-16 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
t" valign="top" width="67%">Water
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
20 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 20 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298978 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
11 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 11 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONCYP (Sonoma Creek at Cypress Ave). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-06-21 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298706 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams
| |
DECISION ID |
143398 |
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fipronil Sulfone |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143398, Fipronil Sulfone
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283846 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fipronil Sulfone |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fipronil Sulfone. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for fipronil degradate fipronil sulfone is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.037 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic). |
| Guideline Reference: |
OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-16 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143398, Fipronil Sulfone
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283826 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fipronil Sulfone |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fipronil Sulfone. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for fipronil degradate fipronil sulfone is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.037 ug/L for an invertebrate (chronic). |
| Guideline Reference: |
OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-16 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONTUR (Sonoma Creek at Turtle Creek Dr.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298708 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299001 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
21 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 21 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299003 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
<
| |
DECISION ID |
143383 |
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Forty-two of the three hundred eighty-seven samples exceed the Basin Plan dissolved oxygen objective for COLD beneficial uses.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List.
This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Forty-two of the three hundred eighty-seven samples exceed the Basin Plan dissolved oxygen objective for COLD beneficial uses and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285769 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32c (Sonoma Creek Mainstem above Frey Tributary Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298587 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
7 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific lit width="33%">Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONTON (Sonoma Creek near Tonelee Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285983 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON205 (Sonoma Creek upstream of Warm Springs West confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286038 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutanerature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON190 (Sonoma Creek at Yulupa Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-06-21 and 2018-06-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298592 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS001 (Fisher Creek Tributary upstream of Sonoma Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298895 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
22 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 22 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of t-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
34 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 34 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-08-03 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286289 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12). |
| Temporal RepreEPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32b (Sonoma Creek at USGS Gage 11458433). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298885 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Sursentation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286524 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
34 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 34 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON011 (Sonoma Creek at Aqua Caliente). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-08-03 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285800 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206KEN001 (Kenwood Creek upstream of confluence with Sonoma Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298767 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON205 (Sonoma Creek upstream of Warm Springs West confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298980 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
23 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
4 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 4 of 23 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The saidth="67%">PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON260 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12 near Hoff St). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-30 and 2012-09-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286545 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONTUR (Sonoma Creek at Turtle Creek Dr.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298617 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
21 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 21 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON011 (Sonoma Creek at Aqua Caliente). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Inforn_2/2021/ref5525.pdf" >Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286546 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON215 (Sonoma Creek at Lawndale Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285568 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
39 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 39 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Datmation: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298582 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON020 (Sonoma Creek @ Watmaugh Road Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-02-06 and 2019-02-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
|  a Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-08-03 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285694 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FRE001 (Frey Tributary just upstream of Sonoma Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288786 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
6 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON019 (Sonoma Creek downstream of W. Watmaugh Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-14 and 2012-08-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288538 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON020 (Sonoma Creek @ Watmaugh Road Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-02-06 and 2019-02-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288633 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285852 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
7 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-06 and 2012-09-26 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285878 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS001 (Fisher Creek Tributary upstream of Sonoma Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288659 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unles="left" valign="top" width="67%">Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS001 (Fisher Creek Tributary upstream of Sonoma Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286523 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
15 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 15 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON180 (Sonoma Creek at 3910 Warm Springs Road, Glen Ellen 95442). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-06-14 and 2018-07-03 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286525 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
s it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.”
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON205 (Sonoma Creek upstream of Warm Springs West confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288762 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-07 and 2012-08-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
143381 |
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Tetramethrin |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143381, Tetramethrin
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289182 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Tetramethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Tetramethrin. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for tetramethrin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 1.85 ug/L for a fish (acute). |
| Guideline Reference: |
OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-16 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143381, Tetramethrin
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289181 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Tetramethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Tetramethrin. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for tetramethrin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 1.85 ug/L for a fish (acute). |
| Guideline Reference: |
OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-16 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
6 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON019 (Sonoma Creek downstream of W. Watmaugh Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-14 and 2012-08-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286664 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
18 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 18 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONCYP (Sonoma Creek at Cypress Ave). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-06-14 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285952 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
39 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 39 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32b (Sonoma Creek at USGS Gage 11458433). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-08-03 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286087 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
143386 |
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy.
Zero samples exceeded the objectives, guidelines, or criteria for beneficial uses applicable to this water segment-pollutant combination, which is less than the minimum number of exceedances needed to place the water segment on the section CWA section 303(d) List for conventional or other pollutants (Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy).
The data used satisfies the data quality requirements (section 6.1.4) and data quantity requirements (section 6.1.5) of the Listing Policy.
Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302730 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
4 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32b (Sonoma Creek at USGS Gage 11458433). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289401 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
4 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples w |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285977 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210b (Sonoma Creek just upstream of Fisher Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289559 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON260 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12 near Hoff St). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-30 and 2012-09-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289498 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS003 (Fisher Creek S. Branch). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289472 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285857 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
15 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 15 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON180 (Sonoma Creek at 3910 Warm Springs Road, Glen Ellen 95442). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-06-14 and 2018-07-03 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285985 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
34 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 34 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ dp" width="67%">3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289447 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factoata from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-08-03 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286244 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS001 (Fisher Creek Tributary upstream of Sonoma Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
| rs shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONCYP (Sonoma Creek at Cypress Ave). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289246 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206KEN001 (Kenwood Creek upstream of confluence with Sonoma Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289580 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-29 and 2012-08-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286257 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS003 (Fisher Creek S. Branch). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286499 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
39 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
6 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 6 of 39 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32b (Sonoma Creek at USGS Gage 11458433). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-08-03 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286501 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
32 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 32 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON020 (Sonoma Creek @ Watmaugh Road Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-08-03 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285814 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
|
|
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289396 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS002 (Fisher Creek at Warm Springs Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289621 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289300 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use sn="left" valign="top" width="33%">Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON300 (Sonoma Creek below Adobe Cyn. Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-10 and 2012-09-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286064 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS002 (Fisher Creek at Warm Springs Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
|
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-08 and 2012-08-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289339 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Planign="left" valign="top" width="67%">The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286439 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON300 (Sonoma Creek below Adobe Cyn. Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-10 and 2012-09-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285724 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON320 (Sonoma Creek above tent park near white barn (headwaters)). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-01 and 2012-08-13 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289893 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS001 (Fisher Creek Tributary upstream of Sonoma Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289464 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FRE001 (Frey Tributary just upstream of Sonoma Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON215 (Sonoma Creek at Lawndale Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285607 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
18 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 18 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONCYP (Sonoma Creek at Cypress Ave). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-06-14 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Sn_2/2021/ref5525.pdf" >Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289269 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON011 (Sonoma Creek at Aqua Caliente). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289573 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-22 and 2012-08-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289907 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON205 (Sonoma Creek upstream of Warm Springs West confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289311 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONTON (Sonoma Creek near Tonelee Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289353 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON215 (Sonoma Creek at Lawndale Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289557 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-28 and 2012-08-28 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289433 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210b (Sonoma Creek just upstream of Fisher Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289567 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
|
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285775 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
3 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206KEN001 (Kenwood Creek upstream of confluence with Sonoma Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286409 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Networwidth="33%">Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONTUR (Sonoma Creek at Turtle Creek Dr.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289084 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32c (Sonoma Creek Mainstem above Frey Tributary Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289326 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher k assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON320 (Sonoma Creek above tent park near white barn (headwaters)). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-01 and 2012-08-13 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285921 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON260 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12 near Hoff St). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-30 and 2012-09-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON019 (Sonoma Creek downstream of W. Watmaugh Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-23 and 2012-08-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289469 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286429 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
6 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON019 (Sonoma Creek downstream of W. Watmaugh Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-14 and 2012-08-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285953 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water align="top" width="67%"> |
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289864 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS003 (Fisher Creek S. Branch). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285859 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON205 (Sonoma Creek upstream of Warm Springs West confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286500 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289556 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
4 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32b (Sonoma Creek at USGS Gage 11458433). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289154 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON020 (Sonoma Creek @ Watmaugh Road Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289578 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin valign="top" width="67%">Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
32 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
3 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 32 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-08-03 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286037 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON300 (Sonoma Creek below Adobe Cyn. Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-10 and 2012-09-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302722 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206KEN001 (Kenwood Creek upstream of confluence with Sonoma Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286159 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32c (Sonoma Creek Mainstem above Frey Tributary Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286194 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONTON (Sonoma Creek near Tonelee Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302888 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-28 and 2012-08-28 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302775 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON320 (Sonoma Creek above tent park near white barn (headwaters)). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-01 and 2012-08-13 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302948 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine benegn="top" width="33%">Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONTUR (Sonoma Creek at Turtle Creek Dr.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286020 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32c (Sonoma Creek Mainstem above Frey Tributary Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Informatificial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON020 (Sonoma Creek @ Watmaugh Road Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302799 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of on Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285529 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210b (Sonoma Creek just upstream of Fisher Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285766 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
32 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 32 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON019 (Sonoma Creek downstream of W. Watmaugh Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-23 and 2012-08-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302843 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON300 (Sonoma Creek below Adobe Cyn. Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-10 and 2012-09-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-08-03 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285770 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
32 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
3 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 32 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON020 (Sonoma Creek @ Watmaugh Road Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-08-03 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302740 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON215 (Sonoma Creek at Lawndale Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302940 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32c (Sonoma Creek Mainstem above Frey Tributary Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302895 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human heaght; PADDING-TOP: 3px; font-smooth: always">Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286036 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON320 (Sonoma Creek above tent park near white barn (headwaters)). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-01 and 2012-08-13 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286339 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
36 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
7 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 7 of 36 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Qulth will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONTUR (Sonoma Creek at Turtle Creek Dr.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302851 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
|
|
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-08-03 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286115 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
7 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-13 and 2012-09-26 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286245 |
| |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302956 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON260 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12 near Hoff St). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-30 and 2012-09-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
Pollutant:
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS002 (Fisher Creek at Warm Springs Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286600 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
7 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Rep>
| LOE ID: |
302738 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS003 (Fisher Creek S. Branch). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302905 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the Caliresentation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-06 and 2012-09-26 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285748 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FRE001 (Frey Tributary just upstream of Sonoma Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286144 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONCYP (Sonoma Creek at Cypress Ave). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302911 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwft" valign="top" width="33%">Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-07 and 2012-08-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286281 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
11 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 11 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON190 (Sonoma Creek at Yulupa Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-06-14 and 2018-06-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information:
|
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS002 (Fisher Creek at Warm Springs Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302721 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206KEN001 (Kenwood Creek upstream of confluence with Sonoma Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 14338td>
| Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286033 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-07 and 2012-08-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285801 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
7 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Moni6, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302832 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FRE001 (Frey Tributary just upstream of Sonoma Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302739 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-13 and 2012-09-26 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286667 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONTON (Sonoma Creek near Tonelee Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON205 (Sonoma Creek upstream of Warm Springs West confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302857 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
4 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302765 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-29 and 2012-08-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286199 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
39 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 39 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-08-03 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286223 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
36 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 36 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302879 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-22 and 2012-08-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302784 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: | th="67%">Non-SWAMP
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-08-03 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286145 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
11 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 11 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON190 (Sonoma Creek at Yulupa Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-06-14 and 2018-06-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| | Water
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302759 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan > |
| LOE ID: |
286334 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
3 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-12 and 2012-10-18 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286225 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-12 and 2012-10-18 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143383, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286240 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
34 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 34 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON011 (Sonoma Creek at Aqua Caliente). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-08-03 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered.
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302866 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
|
|
| |
DECISION ID |
143399 |
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143399, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286542 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for permethrin is 1 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of permethrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Permethrin |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-11-16 to 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143399, Permethrin
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286447 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for permethrin is 1 ng/L (expressed as a 4-day average). If the freely dissolved concentrations of permethrin were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water Quality Criteria Report for Permethrin |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-11-16 to 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
align="top" width="33%">Spatial Representation:
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS001 (Fisher Creek Tributary upstream of Sonoma Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302687 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
| |
DECISION ID |
143387 |
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
| |
|
| Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143387, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287603 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Pyrethroids. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The summed ratios of the pyrethroid pesticides bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, esfenvalerate, lambda-cyhalothrin, permethrin and their respective chronic concentration goals are not to exceed 1. If the freely dissolved concentrations of these pesticides were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolvDING-TOP: 3px; font-smooth: always">Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302766 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON011 (Sonoma Creek at Aqua Caliente). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302878 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-08 and 2012-08-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302904 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210b (Sonoma Creek just upstream of Fisher Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
ed concentrations, total concentrations were used.
| Guideline Reference: |
Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-23 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143387, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287686 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Pyrethroids. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The summed ratios of the pyrethroid pesticides bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, esfenvalerate, lambda-cyhalothrin, permethrin and their respective chronic concentration goals are not to exceed 1. If the freely dissolved concentrations of these pesticides were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-23 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143387, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287763 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The summed ratios of the pyrethroid pesticides bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, esfenvalerate, lambda-cyhalothrin, permethrin and their respective chronic concentration goals are not to exceed 1. If the freely dissolved concentrations of these pesticides were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-11-16 to 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143387, Pyrethroids
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287702 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Pyrethroids |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Pyrethroids. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The summed ratios of the pyrethroid pesticides bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, esfenvalerate, lambda-cyhalothrin, permethrin and their respective chronic concentration goals are not to exceed 1. If the freely dissolved concentrations of these pesticides were reported or could be calculated then these values were used for this assessment. In the absence of freely dissolved concentrations, total concentrations were used. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins for the Control of Pyrethroid Pesticide Discharges |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2017-11-16 to 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
143384 |
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
One line of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. One of the two hundred forty-eight samples exceed the Basin Plan objective.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List.
This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. One of the two hundred forty-eight samples exceed the Basin Plan objective and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286853 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
7 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
Ob
| |
DECISION ID |
143380 |
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
T-Fluvalinate |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143380, T-Fluvalinate
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288346 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
T-Fluvalinate |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for T-Fluvalinate. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for tau-fluvalinate is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.064 ug/L for a fish (chronic). |
| Guideline Reference: |
OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-16 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143380, T-Fluvalinate
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288347 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
T-Fluvalinate |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for T-Fluvalinate. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for tau-fluvalinate is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 0.064 ug/L for a fish (chronic). |
| Guideline Reference: |
OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-16 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
jective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-13 and 2012-09-26 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287040 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-07 and 2012-08-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
|
| |
DECISION ID |
143385 |
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollution |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy.
The number of measured exceedances is less than the minimum number of exceedances needed to place the water segment on the section CWA section 303(d) List for conventional pollutants (Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy).
The data used satisfies the data quality requirements (section 6.1.4) and data quantity requirements (section 6.1.5) of the Listing Policy.
Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that this water segment-pollutant combination should not be placed on the CWA section 303(d) List.
Refer to the lines of evidence in this fact sheet for the data and information, sample counts and exceedances, quality assurance documentation, beneficial uses, and water quality objectives or numeric evaluation guidelines relied upon for this decision. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289105 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficialeft" valign="top" width="67%">287653 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210b (Sonoma Creek just upstream of Fisher Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286355 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON300 (Sonoma Creek below Adobe Cyn. Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-10 and 2012-09-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288813 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288985 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
18 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 18 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONCYP (Sonoma Creek at Cypress Ave). |
< Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2)
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206KEN001 (Kenwood Creek upstream of confluence with Sonoma Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286959 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
6 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-09 and 2012-09-26 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287373 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Temporal Representation:
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-06-14 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288750 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
34 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 34 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-20 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, r>
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
20 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 20 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287570 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288775 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS002 (Fisher Creek at Warm Springs Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288491 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recign="left" valign="top" width="33%">Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONTON (Sonoma Creek near Tonelee Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287340 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
22 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 22 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32b (Sonoma Creek at USGS Gage 11458433). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287794 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
|
|
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
41 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 41 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32b (Sonoma Creek at USGS Gage 11458433). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-20 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288859 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Number of Samples: |
7 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON190 (Sonoma Creek at Yulupa Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-06-21 and 2018-06-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286921 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
21 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 21 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON011 (Sonoma Creek at Aqua Caliente). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental C0/ref5099.xlsx">Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32c (Sonoma Creek Mainstem above Frey Tributary Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289128 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
36 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 36 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286786 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FRE001 (Frey Tributary just upstream of Sonoma Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287101 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON011 (Sonoma Creek at Aqua Caliente). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-20 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288705 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FRE001 (Frey Tributary just upstream of Sonoma Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288460 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
15 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 15 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON180 (Sonoma Creek at 3910 Warm Springs Road, Glen Ellen 95442). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-06-14 and 2018-07-03 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: | 3%">Data Used to Assess Water Quality:
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287507 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
22 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 22 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288808 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
41 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 41 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-20 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287136 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS002 (Fisher Creek at Warm Springs Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287104 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289145 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONTUR (Sonoma Creek at Turtle Creek Dr.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288784 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedov/water_issues/programs/tmdl/records/region_2/2020/ref5099.xlsx">Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON215 (Sonoma Creek at Lawndale Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286962 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON260 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12 near Hoff St). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-30 and 2012-09-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210b (Sonoma Creek just upstream of Fisher Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288773 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
38 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 38 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-20 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288927 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008,EIGHT: bold; PADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; WIDTH: 100%; text-align: left; PADDING-TOP: 3px; font-smooth: always">Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287255 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON300 (Sonoma Creek below Adobe Cyn. Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-10 and 2012-09-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287651 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
23 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 23 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206KEN001 (Kenwood Creek upstream of confluence with Sonoma Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288473 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
11 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 11 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammoniad align="left" valign="top" width="33%">SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287736 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
20 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 20 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON020 (Sonoma Creek @ Watmaugh Road Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON190 (Sonoma Creek at Yulupa Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-06-14 and 2018-06-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288873 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONTON (Sonoma Creek near Tonelee Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3: always">Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286814 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-12 and 2012-10-18 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286772 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON320 (Sonoma Creek above tent park near white barn (headwaters)). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-01 and 2012-08-13 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287548 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS001 (Fisher Creek Tributary upstream of Sonoma Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289004 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
36 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 36 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-20 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288696 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
7 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-13 and 2012-09-26 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289104 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water QuWIDTH: 100%; text-align: left; PADDING-TOP: 3px; font-smooth: always">Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287797 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32c (Sonoma Creek Mainstem above Frey Tributary Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287527 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS003 (Fisher Creek S. Branch). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287145 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
6 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON019 (Sonoma Creek downstream of W. Watmaugh Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-14 and 2012-08-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287481 |
| |
|
| Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON260 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12 near Hoff St). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-30 and 2012-09-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288470 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS003 (Fisher Creek S. Branch). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288785 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideln="top" width="33%">Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
21 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 21 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287539 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-12 and 2012-10-18 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289213 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
Evaluation Guideline:
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON205 (Sonoma Creek upstream of Warm Springs West confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287135 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
11 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 11 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONCYP (Sonoma Creek at Cypress Ave). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-06-21 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286788 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONTUR (Sonoma Creek at Turtle Creek Dr.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287732 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
9 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON180 (Sonoma Creek at 3910 Warm Springs Road, Glen Ellen 95442). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-06-21 and 2018-07-03 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
r> |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON215 (Sonoma Creek at Lawndale Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288747 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON320 (Sonoma Creek above tent park near white barn (headwaters)). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-01 and 2012-08-13 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288684 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
7 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-06 and 2012-09-26 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289070 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
33 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 33 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON020 (Sonoma Creek @ Watmaugh Road Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-20 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298703 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS003 (Fisher Creek S. Branch). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298798 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-12 and 2012-10-18 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298532 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONTON (Sonoma Creek near Tonelee Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298819 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
9 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON180 (Sonoma Creek at 3910 Warm Springs Road, Glen Ellen 95442). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-06-21 and 2018-07-03 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298799 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON300 (Sonoma Creek below Adobe Cyn. Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-10 and 2012-09-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298589 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
6 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON019 (Sonoma Creek downstream of W. Watmaugh Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-14 and 2012-08-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298736 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
6 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-09 and 2012-09-26 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298876 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON320 (Sonoma Creek above tent park near white barn (headwaters)). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-01 and 2012-08-13 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298910 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
22 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 22 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298635 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
20 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 20 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON020 (Sonoma Creek @ Watmaugh Road Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298601 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
7 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-13 and 2012-09-26 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298605 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210b (Sonoma Creek just upstream of Fisher Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298606 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FRE001 (Frey Tributary just upstream of Sonoma Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298789 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-07 and 2012-08-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298529 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON260 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12 near Hoff St). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-30 and 2012-09-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298820 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON215 (Sonoma Creek at Lawndale Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298658 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS002 (Fisher Creek at Warm Springs Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298535 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
20 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 20 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298978 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
11 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 11 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONCYP (Sonoma Creek at Cypress Ave). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-06-21 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298706 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONTUR (Sonoma Creek at Turtle Creek Dr.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298708 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299001 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
21 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 21 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299003 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32c (Sonoma Creek Mainstem above Frey Tributary Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298587 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
7 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON190 (Sonoma Creek at Yulupa Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-06-21 and 2018-06-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298592 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS001 (Fisher Creek Tributary upstream of Sonoma Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298895 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
22 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 22 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32b (Sonoma Creek at USGS Gage 11458433). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298885 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206KEN001 (Kenwood Creek upstream of confluence with Sonoma Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298767 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON205 (Sonoma Creek upstream of Warm Springs West confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298980 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
23 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
4 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 4 of 23 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298617 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
21 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 21 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON011 (Sonoma Creek at Aqua Caliente). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298582 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON020 (Sonoma Creek @ Watmaugh Road Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-02-06 and 2019-02-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288786 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
6 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON019 (Sonoma Creek downstream of W. Watmaugh Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-14 and 2012-08-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288538 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON020 (Sonoma Creek @ Watmaugh Road Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-02-06 and 2019-02-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288633 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS001 (Fisher Creek Tributary upstream of Sonoma Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288659 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON205 (Sonoma Creek upstream of Warm Springs West confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-19 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143385, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288762 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-07 and 2012-08-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
143381 |
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Tetramethrin |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143381, Tetramethrin
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289182 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Tetramethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Tetramethrin. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for tetramethrin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 1.85 ug/L for a fish (acute). |
| Guideline Reference: |
OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-16 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143381, Tetramethrin
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289181 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Tetramethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Tetramethrin. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for tetramethrin is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 1.85 ug/L for a fish (acute). |
| Guideline Reference: |
OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-16 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
143386 |
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy.
Zero samples exceeded the objectives, guidelines, or criteria for beneficial uses applicable to this water segment-pollutant combination, which is less than the minimum number of exceedances needed to place the water segment on the section CWA section 303(d) List for conventional or other pollutants (Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy).
The data used satisfies the data quality requirements (section 6.1.4) and data quantity requirements (section 6.1.5) of the Listing Policy.
Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302730 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
4 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32b (Sonoma Creek at USGS Gage 11458433). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289401 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
4 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289559 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON260 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12 near Hoff St). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-30 and 2012-09-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289498 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS003 (Fisher Creek S. Branch). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289472 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289447 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONCYP (Sonoma Creek at Cypress Ave). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289246 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206KEN001 (Kenwood Creek upstream of confluence with Sonoma Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289580 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-29 and 2012-08-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289396 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS002 (Fisher Creek at Warm Springs Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289621 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289300 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-08 and 2012-08-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289339 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON320 (Sonoma Creek above tent park near white barn (headwaters)). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-01 and 2012-08-13 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289893 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS001 (Fisher Creek Tributary upstream of Sonoma Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289464 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FRE001 (Frey Tributary just upstream of Sonoma Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289269 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON011 (Sonoma Creek at Aqua Caliente). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289573 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-22 and 2012-08-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289907 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON205 (Sonoma Creek upstream of Warm Springs West confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289311 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONTON (Sonoma Creek near Tonelee Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289353 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON215 (Sonoma Creek at Lawndale Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289557 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-28 and 2012-08-28 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289433 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210b (Sonoma Creek just upstream of Fisher Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289567 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONTUR (Sonoma Creek at Turtle Creek Dr.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289084 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32c (Sonoma Creek Mainstem above Frey Tributary Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289326 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON019 (Sonoma Creek downstream of W. Watmaugh Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-23 and 2012-08-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289469 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289864 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289556 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
4 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32b (Sonoma Creek at USGS Gage 11458433). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289154 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON020 (Sonoma Creek @ Watmaugh Road Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289578 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON300 (Sonoma Creek below Adobe Cyn. Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-10 and 2012-09-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302722 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONTON (Sonoma Creek near Tonelee Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302888 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-28 and 2012-08-28 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302775 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON320 (Sonoma Creek above tent park near white barn (headwaters)). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-01 and 2012-08-13 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302948 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON020 (Sonoma Creek @ Watmaugh Road Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302799 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON019 (Sonoma Creek downstream of W. Watmaugh Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-23 and 2012-08-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302843 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON300 (Sonoma Creek below Adobe Cyn. Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-10 and 2012-09-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302740 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON215 (Sonoma Creek at Lawndale Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302940 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32c (Sonoma Creek Mainstem above Frey Tributary Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302895 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONTUR (Sonoma Creek at Turtle Creek Dr.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302851 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302956 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON260 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12 near Hoff St). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-30 and 2012-09-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302738 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS003 (Fisher Creek S. Branch). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302905 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONCYP (Sonoma Creek at Cypress Ave). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302911 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS002 (Fisher Creek at Warm Springs Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302721 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206KEN001 (Kenwood Creek upstream of confluence with Sonoma Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302832 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FRE001 (Frey Tributary just upstream of Sonoma Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302739 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON205 (Sonoma Creek upstream of Warm Springs West confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302857 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
4 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302765 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-29 and 2012-08-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302879 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-22 and 2012-08-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302784 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302759 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302866 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS001 (Fisher Creek Tributary upstream of Sonoma Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302687 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302766 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON011 (Sonoma Creek at Aqua Caliente). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-24 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302878 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-08-08 and 2012-08-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143386, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302904 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210b (Sonoma Creek just upstream of Fisher Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
143384 |
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
One line of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. One of the two hundred forty-eight samples exceed the Basin Plan objective.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List.
This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. One of the two hundred forty-eight samples exceed the Basin Plan objective and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286853 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
7 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-13 and 2012-09-26 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287040 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-07 and 2012-08-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287653 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210b (Sonoma Creek just upstream of Fisher Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286355 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206KEN001 (Kenwood Creek upstream of confluence with Sonoma Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286959 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
6 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-09 and 2012-09-26 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287373 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
20 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 20 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON140 (Sonoma Creek near Sonoma Ecology Center). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287570 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONTON (Sonoma Creek near Tonelee Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287340 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
22 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 22 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32b (Sonoma Creek at USGS Gage 11458433). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287794 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
7 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON190 (Sonoma Creek at Yulupa Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-06-21 and 2018-06-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286921 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
21 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 21 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON011 (Sonoma Creek at Aqua Caliente). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286786 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FRE001 (Frey Tributary just upstream of Sonoma Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287101 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287507 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
22 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 22 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON210 (Sonoma Creek at 986 Warm Springs Road). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287136 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS002 (Fisher Creek at Warm Springs Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287104 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON215 (Sonoma Creek at Lawndale Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286962 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON260 (Sonoma Creek at Hwy 12 near Hoff St). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-30 and 2012-09-06 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287255 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON300 (Sonoma Creek below Adobe Cyn. Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-10 and 2012-09-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287651 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
23 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 23 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287736 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
20 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 20 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON020 (Sonoma Creek @ Watmaugh Road Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286814 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON050 (Sonoma Creek at Maxwell Park). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-12 and 2012-10-18 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286772 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON320 (Sonoma Creek above tent park near white barn (headwaters)). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-01 and 2012-08-13 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287548 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS001 (Fisher Creek Tributary upstream of Sonoma Creek Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287797 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON32c (Sonoma Creek Mainstem above Frey Tributary Confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287527 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206FIS003 (Fisher Creek S. Branch). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287145 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
6 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON019 (Sonoma Creek downstream of W. Watmaugh Rd.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-14 and 2012-08-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287481 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
21 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 21 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON160 (Sonoma Creek at Glen Allen). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-27 and 2019-07-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287539 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON205 (Sonoma Creek upstream of Warm Springs West confluence). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287135 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
11 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 11 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONCYP (Sonoma Creek at Cypress Ave). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-06-21 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286788 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SONTUR (Sonoma Creek at Turtle Creek Dr.). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2019-06-26 and 2019-07-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 143384, pH
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287732 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
9 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Sonoma Creek, non-tidal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206SON180 (Sonoma Creek at 3910 Warm Springs Road, Glen Ellen 95442). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-06-21 and 2018-07-03 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
87152 |
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Sedimentation/Siltation |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL)(2016) |
| Revision Status |
Original |
| Sources: |
A Source Unknown |
| TMDL Name: |
Sonoma Creek Sediment |
| TMDL Project Code: |
64 |
| Date TMDL Approved by USEPA: |
07/12/2010 |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
This decision is related to a mapping change. Sonoma Creek split into tidal and non-tidal portions. Data supporting impairment associated with this non-tidal portion.
The listing for sediment in Sonoma Creek originated from fine sediment impacts to spawning and rearing habitat as noted in the TMDL. The TMDL provides actions to reduce fine sediment input to the non-tidal portions of the main stems and all freshwater tributaries. When Sonoma Creek was one water body segment, the impairment and TMDL applied to entire main stem segment. Now that we have separated Sonoma Creek into tidal and non-tidal segments for the Integrated Report, we apply the listing for sediment only to the non-tidal segment to be consistent with the impairment analyses and implementation actions required in the TMDL. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
The listing for sediment in Sonoma Creek originated from fine sediment impacts to spawning and rearing habitat as noted in the TMDL. The TMDL provides actions to reduce fine sediment input to the non-tidal portions of the main stems and all freshwater tributaries. When Sonoma Creek was one water body segment, the impairment and TMDL applied to entire main stem segment. Now that we have separated Sonoma Creek into tidal and non-tidal segments for the Integrated Report, we apply the listing for sediment only to the non-tidal segment to be consistent with the impairment analyses and implementation actions required in the TMDL. |
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 87152, Sedimentation/Siltation
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
94540 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Sedimentation/Siltation |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
Not Specified |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. |
| Data Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Unspecified |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Unspecified |
| Guideline Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Unspecified |
| Temporal Representation: |
Unspecified |
| Environmental Conditions: |
Unspecified |
| QAPP Information: |
Unspecified |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
87152 |
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Sedimentation/Siltation |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL)(2016) |
| Revision Status |
Original |
| Sources: |
A Source Unknown |
| TMDL Name: |
Sonoma Creek Sediment |
| TMDL Project Code: |
64 |
| Date TMDL Approved by USEPA: |
07/12/2010 |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
This decision is related to a mapping change. Sonoma Creek split into tidal and non-tidal portions. Data supporting impairment associated with this non-tidal portion.
The listing for sediment in Sonoma Creek originated from fine sediment impacts to spawning and rearing habitat as noted in the TMDL. The TMDL provides actions to reduce fine sediment input to the non-tidal portions of the main stems and all freshwater tributaries. When Sonoma Creek was one water body segment, the impairment and TMDL applied to entire main stem segment. Now that we have separated Sonoma Creek into tidal and non-tidal segments for the Integrated Report, we apply the listing for sediment only to the non-tidal segment to be consistent with the impairment analyses and implementation actions required in the TMDL. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
The listing for sediment in Sonoma Creek originated from fine sediment impacts to spawning and rearing habitat as noted in the TMDL. The TMDL provides actions to reduce fine sediment input to the non-tidal portions of the main stems and all freshwater tributaries. When Sonoma Creek was one water body segment, the impairment and TMDL applied to entire main stem segment. Now that we have separated Sonoma Creek into tidal and non-tidal segments for the Integrated Report, we apply the listing for sediment only to the non-tidal segment to be consistent with the impairment analyses and implementation actions required in the TMDL. |
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 87152, Sedimentation/Siltation
|
Region 2 |
Sonoma Creek, non-tidal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
94540 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Sedimentation/Siltation |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
Not Specified |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. |
| Data Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Unspecified |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Unspecified |
| Guideline Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Unspecified |
| Temporal Representation: |
Unspecified |
| Environmental Conditions: |
Unspecified |
| QAPP Information: |
Unspecified |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
| |