Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205944 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
36 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 36 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205799 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
36 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 36 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-02-11 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
206135 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
<
| |
DECISION ID |
125361 |
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
This decision was made by SWRCB staff. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205944 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
36 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 36 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1td align="left" valign="top" width="33%">Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-24 and 2014-04-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205797 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
40 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 40 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205799 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
36 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 36 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-02-11 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
206135 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
<" width="67%">The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2)
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205946 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
36 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 5 of 36 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205593 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habittd align="left" valign="top" width="33%">Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-24 and 2014-04-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205797 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
40 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 40 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-07 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205711 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Rep" width="67%">The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205946 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
36 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 5 of 36 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205593 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitresentation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-21 and 2014-05-21 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205923 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
36 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 36 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-02-11 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205775 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
at
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-07 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205711 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Rep | Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
36 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 36 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
206027 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
36 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 5 of 36 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| &resentation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-21 and 2014-05-21 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205923 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
36 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 36 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-02-11 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205775 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
nbsp;
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
206025 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
40 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 40 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205823 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| | Cold Freshwater Habitat
| |
| Number of Samples: |
36 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 36 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
206027 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
36 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 5 of 36 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
206025 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
40 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 40 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205823 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-22 and 2014-04-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205950 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fr>
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-22 and 2014-04-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205950 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205709 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2014-04-14 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205686 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved | ishes of California
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205709 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2014-04-14 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205686 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205688 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205688 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-22 and 2014-04-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205800 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2014-04-14 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205993 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction:Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-22 and 2014-04-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205800 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2014-04-14 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
205993 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-21 and 2014-05-21 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
206057 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-24 and 2014-04-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
206075 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-07 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
|
d>
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-21 and 2014-05-21 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
206057 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-24 and 2014-04-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125361, Temperature, water
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
206075 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Plans. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-07 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 153672, Total Dissolved Solids
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
313248 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Total Dissolved Solids |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for Total Dissolved Solids. Additionally, 0 of the 5 samples fall within the range, and 5 of 5 samples fall below the threshold. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for total dissolved solids of 500 - 1000 mg/L assessed as an annual average. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: CA_BVR-AC2 (Adobe Creek Finley). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 153672, Total Dissolved Solids
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
313272 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Total Dissolved Solids |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for Total Dissolved Solids. Additionally, 0 of the 5 samples fall within the range, and 5 of 5 samples fall below the threshold. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for total dissolved solids of 500 - 1000 mg/L assessed as an annual average. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: CA_BVR-AC3 (Adobe Creek at Merritt Crossing). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-21 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 153672, Total Dissolved Solids
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
313253 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Total Dissolved Solids |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for Total Dissolved Solids. Additionally, 0 of the 5 samples fall within the range, and 5 of 5 samples fall below the threshold. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for total dissolved solids of 500 - 1000 mg/L assessed as an annual average. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: CA_BVR-AC1 (Adobe Creek at Soda Bay Rd at Rancho De La Fuente). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 153672, Total Dissolved Solids
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
313226 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Total Dissolved Solids |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the upper limit of the range for Total Dissolved Solids. Additionally, 0 of the 5 samples fall within the range, and 5 of 5 samples fall below the threshold. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Secondary MCL that is incorporated by reference into the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins specifies a range for total dissolved solids of 500 - 1000 mg/L assessed as an annual average. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: CA_BVR-AC4 (Adobe Creek Bell Hill). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-22 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203551 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
29 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 29 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Rive
| |
DECISION ID |
169858 |
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2020) |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
Thirty lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant for Cold Freshwater Habitat (COLD), Water Contact Recreation (REC-1), and Non-Contact Recreation (REC-2). LOEs 203625, 203428, and 203297 were determined to be duplicates and were removed from the decision. Six of the 123 samples exceed the objective for COLD. Six of the 123 samples exceed the objective for REC-1. Six of the 123 samples exceed the objective for REC-2.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List.
This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Six of the 123 samples exceed the objective for COLD. Six of the 123 samples exceed the objective for REC-1. Six of the 123 samples exceed the objective for REC-2. This does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203551 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
29 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 29 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203592 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-22 and 2014-04-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203421 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Frar Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203592 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-22 and 2014-04-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203421 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
29 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 29 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203435 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-22 and 2014-04-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
29 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 29 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203435 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-22 and 2014-04-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203322 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-14 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203395 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
28 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 28 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-13 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203483 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-24 and 2014-04-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203491 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203322 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-14 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203395 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
28 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 28 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
Pollutant-Water
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-21 and 2014-05-21 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203694 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-13 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203483 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-24 and 2014-04-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203491 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203450 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
32 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 32 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203396 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
24 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 24 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-13 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203575 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2014-04-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203436 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-14 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203524 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-22 and 2014-04-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203517 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
28 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 28 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-13 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203301 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-14 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203693 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake Countytop" width="67%">Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-21 and 2014-05-21 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203694 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
|
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203321 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-24 and 2014-04-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203507 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
32 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 32 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
width="67%">STORET
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203450 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
32 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 32 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203396 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
24 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 24 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203755 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
28 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 28 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-13 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203292 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assess in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-13 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203575 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2014-04-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203436 |
| |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203488 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2014-04-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
|
|
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-14 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203524 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-22 and 2014-04-22 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203753 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
29 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 29 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203437 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-24 and 2014-04-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203430 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-21 and 2014-05-21 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203553 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
24 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 24 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-13 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203608 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-21 and 2014-05-21 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203517 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
28 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 28 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-13 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203301 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203690 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2014-04-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203452 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
32 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 32 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203758 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
24 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 24 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-13 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
|
="33%">Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-14 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203693 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203321 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-24 and 2014-04-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203507 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
32 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 32 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203755 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
28 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 28 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-13 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203292 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203488 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2014-04-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203753 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
29 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 29 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203437 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-24 and 2014-04-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203430 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-21 and 2014-05-21 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203553 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
24 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 24 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-13 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203608 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-21 and 2014-05-21 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203690 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2014-04-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203452 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
32 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 32 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 169858, pH
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
203758 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
24 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 24 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin: pH should not be lower than 6.5 or higher than 8.5. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-13 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202942 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-24 and 2014-04-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202906 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
26 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
15 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 15 of 26 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-13 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202941 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-22 and 2014-05-21 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202909 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
31 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
10 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 10 of 31 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as SPWN is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-13 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202908 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
32 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
9 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 9 of 32 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as SPWN is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202910 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
26 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
15 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 15 of 26 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as SPWN is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-13 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202935 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
34 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
11 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 11 of 34 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as SPWN is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202970 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as SPWN is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-22 and 2014-05-21 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202969 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as SPWN is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202971 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as SPWN is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-24 and 2014-04-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202968 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
3 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as SPWN is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202939 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
3 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202940 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202904 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
34 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
11 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 11 of 34 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202907 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
32 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
9 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 9 of 32 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202905 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
31 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
10 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 10 of 31 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-13 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202942 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-24 and 2014-04-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202906 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
26 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
15 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 15 of 26 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-13 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202941 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-22 and 2014-05-21 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202909 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
31 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
10 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 10 of 31 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as SPWN is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-13 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202908 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
32 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
9 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 9 of 32 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as SPWN is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202910 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
26 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
15 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 15 of 26 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as SPWN is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-13 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202935 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
34 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
11 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 11 of 34 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as SPWN is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202970 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as SPWN is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-22 and 2014-05-21 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202969 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as SPWN is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202971 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as SPWN is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC4) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-24 and 2014-04-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202968 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
3 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as SPWN is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202939 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
3 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-03-03 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202940 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2014-12-05 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202904 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
34 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
11 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 11 of 34 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC2) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202907 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
32 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
9 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 9 of 32 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC1) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-12-05 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125359, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 5 |
Adobe Creek (Lake County) |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
202905 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
31 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
10 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed STORET data for Adobe Creek (Lake County) to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 10 of 31 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
WQX data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 5. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The minimum dissolved oxygen concentration for waters designated as COLD is 7.0 mg/L. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Valley Region, Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin Basin) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins; Fifth Edition. Revised May 2018 (with approved amendments) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (CA_BVR-AC3) |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-02-13 and 2018-05-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
STORET |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |