Final California 2026 Integrated Report (303(d) List/305(b) Report)
Supporting Information
Regional Board 4 - Los Angeles Region
| Water Body Name: |
Edison Canal
|
| Water Body ID: |
CAR4100000020210319053913 |
| Water Body Type: |
River & Stream |
| |
DECISION ID |
140642 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Aldrin |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
1 lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of the 17 samples exceed the CRITERIA.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.
This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of the 17 samples exceed the CRITERIA and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140642, Aldrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
256439 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Aldrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Aldrin. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The aldrin criterion maximum concentration (expressed as a 1-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.65 ug/L. The criterion of 1.3 ug/L provided in the California Toxics Rule is an instantaneous maximum concentration and was divided by 2 in order to better represent a criterion maximum concentration (CMC) value as specified in footnote (g) of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule (2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-02 and 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140642, Aldrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
256443 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Aldrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Aldrin. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The aldrin criterion maximum concentration (expressed as a 1-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.65 ug/L. The criterion of 1.3 ug/L provided in the California Toxics Rule is an instantaneous maximum concentration and was divided by 2 in order to better represent a criterion maximum concentration (CMC) value as specified in footnote (g) of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule (2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140642, Aldrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
256402 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Aldrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Aldrin. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The aldrin criterion maximum concentration (expressed as a 1-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.65 ug/L. The criterion of 1.3 ug/L provided in the California Toxics Rule is an instantaneous maximum concentration and was divided by 2 in order to better represent a criterion maximum concentration (CMC) value as specified in footnote (g) of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule (2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-08 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140642, Aldrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
256387 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Aldrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Aldrin. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The aldrin criterion maximum concentration (expressed as a 1-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.65 ug/L. The criterion of 1.3 ug/L provided in the California Toxics Rule is an instantaneous maximum concentration and was divided by 2 in order to better represent a criterion maximum concentration (CMC) value as specified in footnote (g) of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule (2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140642, Aldrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
256420 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Aldrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Aldrin. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The aldrin criterion maximum concentration (expressed as a 1-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.65 ug/L. The criterion of 1.3 ug/L provided in the California Toxics Rule is an instantaneous maximum concentration and was divided by 2 in order to better represent a criterion maximum concentration (CMC) value as specified in footnote (g) of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule (2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140642 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Aldrin |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
1 lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of the 17 samples exceed the CRITERIA.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.
This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of the 17 samples exceed the CRITERIA and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140642, Aldrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
256439 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Aldrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Aldrin. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The aldrin criterion maximum concentration (expressed as a 1-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.65 ug/L. The criterion of 1.3 ug/L provided in the California Toxics Rule is an instantaneous maximum concentration and was divided by 2 in order to better represent a criterion maximum concentration (CMC) value as specified in footnote (g) of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule (2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-02 and 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140642, Aldrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
256443 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Aldrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Aldrin. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The aldrin criterion maximum concentration (expressed as a 1-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.65 ug/L. The criterion of 1.3 ug/L provided in the California Toxics Rule is an instantaneous maximum concentration and was divided by 2 in order to better represent a criterion maximum concentration (CMC) value as specified in footnote (g) of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule (2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140642, Aldrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
LOE I
| |
DECISION ID |
150433 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150433, Ammonia
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257050 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: For inland surface waters not characteristic of freshwater, the four-day average concentration of unionized ammonia shall not exceed 0.035 mg/L and the one-hour average concentration shall not exceed 0.233 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison CD: |
256402 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Aldrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Aldrin. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The aldrin criterion maximum concentration (expressed as a 1-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.65 ug/L. The criterion of 1.3 ug/L provided in the California Toxics Rule is an instantaneous maximum concentration and was divided by 2 in order to better represent a criterion maximum concentration (CMC) value as specified in footnote (g) of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule (2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-08 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140642, Aldrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
256387 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Aldrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Aldrin. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The aldrin criterion maximum concentration (expressed as a 1-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.65 ug/L. The criterion of 1.3 ug/L provided in the California Toxics Rule is an instantaneous maximum concentration and was divided by 2 in order to better represent a criterion maximum concentration (CMC) value as specified in footnote (g) of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule (2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140642, Aldrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
256420 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Aldrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Aldrin. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The aldrin criterion maximum concentration (expressed as a 1-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.65 ug/L. The criterion of 1.3 ug/L provided in the California Toxics Rule is an instantaneous maximum concentration and was divided by 2 in order to better represent a criterion maximum concentration (CMC) value as specified in footnote (g) of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule (2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
anal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-22 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150433, Ammonia
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257076 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: For inland surface waters not characteristic of freshwater, the four-day average concentration of unionized ammonia shall not exceed 0.035 mg/L and the one-hour average concentration shall not exceed 0.233 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-22 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150433, Ammonia
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257243 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: For inland surface waters not characteristic of freshwater, the four-day average concentration of unionized ammonia shall not exceed 0.035 mg/L and the one-hour average concentration shall not exceed 0.233 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-29 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150433, Ammonia
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257094 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: For inland surface waters not characteristic of freshwater, the four-day average concentration of unionized ammonia shall not exceed 0.035 mg/L and the one-hour average concentration shall not exceed 0.233 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-22 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150433, Ammonia
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257198 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: For inland surface waters not characteristic of freshwater, the four-day average concentration of unionized ammonia shall not exceed 0.035 mg/L and the one-hour average concentration shall not exceed 0.233 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-22 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
150433 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150433, Ammonia
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257050 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: For inland surface waters not characteristic of freshwater, the four-day average concentration of unionized ammonia shall not exceed 0.035 mg/L and the one-hour average concentration shall not exceed 0.233 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-22 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150433, Ammonia
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257076 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: For inland surface waters not characteristic of freshwater, the four-day average concentration of unionized ammonia shall not exceed 0.035 mg/L and the one-hour average concentration shall not exceed 0.233 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-22 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150433, Ammonia
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257243 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
Data an
| |
DECISION ID |
140613 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140613, Arsenic
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257349 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved arsenic criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 36 ug/L. The conversion factor used to convert the total fraction criterion for arsenic to dissolved fraction criterion is 1. Therefore all data was considered to be representative of the dissolved fraction. (California Toxics Rule, 2000) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Referencd Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: For inland surface waters not characteristic of freshwater, the four-day average concentration of unionized ammonia shall not exceed 0.035 mg/L and the one-hour average concentration shall not exceed 0.233 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-29 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150433, Ammonia
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257094 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: For inland surface waters not characteristic of freshwater, the four-day average concentration of unionized ammonia shall not exceed 0.035 mg/L and the one-hour average concentration shall not exceed 0.233 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-22 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 150433, Ammonia
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257198 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: For inland surface waters not characteristic of freshwater, the four-day average concentration of unionized ammonia shall not exceed 0.035 mg/L and the one-hour average concentration shall not exceed 0.233 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-22 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
e: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140613, Arsenic
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257589 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved arsenic criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 36 ug/L. The conversion factor used to convert the total fraction criterion for arsenic to dissolved fraction criterion is 1. Therefore all data was considered to be representative of the dissolved fraction. (California Toxics Rule, 2000) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140613, Arsenic
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257308 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved arsenic criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 36 ug/L. The conversion factor used to convert the total fraction criterion for arsenic to dissolved fraction criterion is 1. Therefore all data was considered to be representative of the dissolved fraction. (California Toxics Rule, 2000) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140613, Arsenic
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257412 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved arsenic criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 36 ug/L. The conversion factor used to convert the total fraction criterion for arsenic to dissolved fraction criterion is 1. Therefore all data was considered to be representative of the dissolved fraction. (California Toxics Rule, 2000) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140613, Arsenic
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257418 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved arsenic criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 36 ug/L. The conversion factor used to convert the total fraction criterion for arsenic to dissolved fraction criterion is 1. Therefore all data was considered to be representative of the dissolved fraction. (California Toxics Rule, 2000) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-08 and 2018-10-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140613 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140613, Arsenic
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257349 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved arsenic criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 36 ug/L. The conversion factor used to convert the total fraction criterion for arsenic to dissolved fraction criterion is 1. Therefore all data was considered to be representative of the dissolved fraction. (California Toxics Rule, 2000) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140613, Arsenic
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257589 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved arsenic criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 36 ug/L. The conversion factor used to convert the total fraction criterion for arsenic to dissolved fraction criterion is 1. Therefore all data was considered to be representative of the dissolved fraction. (California Toxics Rule, 2000) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140613, Arsenic
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257308 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved arsenic criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 36 ug/L. The conversion factor used to convert the total fraction criterion for arsenic to dissolved fraction criterion is 1. Therefore all data was considered to be representative of the dissolved fraction. (California Toxics Rule, 2000) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140613, Arsenic
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257412 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved arsenic criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 36 ug/L. The conversion factor used to convert the total fraction criterion for arsenic to dissolved fraction criterion is 1. Therefore all data was considered to be representative of the dissolved fraction. (California Toxics Rule, 2000) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140613, Arsenic
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257418 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved arsenic criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 36 ug/L. The conversion factor used to convert the total fraction criterion for arsenic to dissolved fraction criterion is 1. Therefore all data was considered to be representative of the dissolved fraction. (California Toxics Rule, 2000) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-08 and 2018-10-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140622 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140622, Azinphos-methyl (Guthion)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257843 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Azinphos Methyl. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Azinphos Methyl (Guthion) expressed as a 4-day average for the protection of saltwater aquatic life is a maximum of 0.01 ug/l. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140622, Azinphos-methyl (Guthion)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257812 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Azinphos Methyl. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Azinphos Methyl (Guthion) expressed as a 4-day average for the protection of saltwater aquatic life is a maximum of 0.01 ug/l. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140622, Azinphos-methyl (Guthion)
|
Region 4 |
<
| |
DECISION ID |
140622 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140622, Azinphos-methyl (Guthion)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257843 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Azinphos Methyl. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The National Recommended Water Quality Criteri/tr>
|
Edison Canal |
| |
| LOE ID: |
257844 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Azinphos Methyl. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Azinphos Methyl (Guthion) expressed as a 4-day average for the protection of saltwater aquatic life is a maximum of 0.01 ug/l. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140622, Azinphos-methyl (Guthion)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257811 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Azinphos Methyl. Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 4 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Azinphos Methyl (Guthion) expressed as a 4-day average for the protection of saltwater aquatic life is a maximum of 0.01 ug/l. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140622, Azinphos-methyl (Guthion)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257827 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Azinphos Methyl. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Azinphos Methyl (Guthion) expressed as a 4-day average for the protection of saltwater aquatic life is a maximum of 0.01 ug/l. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
a for Azinphos Methyl (Guthion) expressed as a 4-day average for the protection of saltwater aquatic life is a maximum of 0.01 ug/l. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140622, Azinphos-methyl (Guthion)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257812 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Azinphos Methyl. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Azinphos Methyl (Guthion) expressed as a 4-day average for the protection of saltwater aquatic life is a maximum of 0.01 ug/l. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140622, Azinphos-methyl (Guthion)
|
Region 4 |
<
| |
DECISION ID |
140640 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140640, Bifenthrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257704 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Bifenthrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The genus mean acute value for a mysid (Mysidopsis bahia) is 0.00397 ug/L (DFG 00-6, 2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Edison Canal |
| |
| LOE ID: |
257844 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Azinphos Methyl. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Azinphos Methyl (Guthion) expressed as a 4-day average for the protection of saltwater aquatic life is a maximum of 0.01 ug/l. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140622, Azinphos-methyl (Guthion)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257811 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Azinphos Methyl. Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 4 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Azinphos Methyl (Guthion) expressed as a 4-day average for the protection of saltwater aquatic life is a maximum of 0.01 ug/l. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140622, Azinphos-methyl (Guthion)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257827 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Azinphos Methyl. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Azinphos Methyl (Guthion) expressed as a 4-day average for the protection of saltwater aquatic life is a maximum of 0.01 ug/l. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/tmdl/records/state_board/2010/ref3734.pdf" >Aquatic Life Criteria for Pyrethroid Insecticides (DFG Administrative Report 00-6, 2000)
|
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-05). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140640 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140640, Bifenthrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257704 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Bifenthrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Bifenthrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The genus mean acute value for a mysid (Mysidopsis bahia) is 0.00397 ug/L (DFG 00-6, 2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic Life Criteria for Pyrethroid Insecticides (DFG Administrative Report 00-6, 2000)
|
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-05). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140614 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140614, Cadmium
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
258071 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cadmium. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved cadmium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 9.3 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring s
| |
DECISION ID |
140614 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140614, Cadmium
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
258071 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cadmium. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved cadmium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 9.3 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140614, Cadmium
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
258188 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cadmium. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved cadmium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 9.3 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140614, Cadmium
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
258189 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140614, Cadmium
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
258188 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cadmium. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved cadmium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 9.3 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140614, Cadmium
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
258189 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cadmium. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved cadmium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 9.3 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140614, Cadmium
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257891 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cadmium. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved cadmium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 9.3 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-08 and 2018-10-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140614, Cadmium
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
258039 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cadmium. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved cadmium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 9.3 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
align="left" valign="top" width="33%">Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cadmium. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved cadmium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 9.3 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140614, Cadmium
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
257891 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cadmium. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved cadmium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 9.3 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-08 and 2018-10-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140614, Cadmium
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
258039 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cadmium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cadmium. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved cadmium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 9.3 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140615 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlordane |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140615, Chlordane
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
267469 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlordane |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Total Chlordane. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 5 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The chlordane criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.004 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
Evaluation Guideline:
| |
DECISION ID |
140615 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlordane |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140615, Chlordane
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
267469 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlordane |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Total Chlordane. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 5 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The chlordane criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.004 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140615, Chlordane
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
267505 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlordane |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Total Chlordane. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The chlordane criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.004 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140615, Chlordane
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
267609 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlordane |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrtd>
| |
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140615, Chlordane
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
267505 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlordane |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Total Chlordane. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The chlordane criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.004 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140615, Chlordane
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
267609 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlordane |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Total Chlordane. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The chlordane criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.004 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140615, Chlordane
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
267628 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlordane |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Total Chlordane. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The chlordane criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.004 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140615, Chlordane
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
267450 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlordane |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Total Chlordane. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The chlordane criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.004 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
ix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Total Chlordane. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The chlordane criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.004 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140615, Chlordane
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
267628 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlordane |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Total Chlordane. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The chlordane criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.004 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140615, Chlordane
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
267450 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlordane |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Total Chlordane. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The chlordane criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.004 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140616 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140616, Chlorpyrifos
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
258427 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chlorpyrifos. Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 4 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The saltwater criterion continuous concentration to protect aquatic organisms is 0.009 u
| |
DECISION ID |
140616 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140616, Chlorpyrifos
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
258427 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chlorpyrifos. Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 4 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The saltwater criterion continuous concentration to protect aquatic organisms is 0.009 ug/L (Siepmann and Finlayson 2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140616, Chlorpyrifos
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
258329 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chlorpyrifos. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The saltwater criterion continuous concentration to protect aquatic organisms is 0.009 ug/L (Siepmann and Finlayson 2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140616, Chlorpyrifos
|
Region 4 |
Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140616, Chlorpyrifos
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
258329 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chlorpyrifos. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The saltwater criterion continuous concentration to protect aquatic organisms is 0.009 ug/L (Siepmann and Finlayson 2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140616, Chlorpyrifos
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
258389 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chlorpyrifos. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The saltwater criterion continuous concentration to protect aquatic organisms is 0.009 ug/L (Siepmann and Finlayson 2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140616, Chlorpyrifos
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
258387 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chlorpyrifos. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The saltwater criterion continuous concentration to protect aquatic organisms is 0.009 ug/L (Siepmann and Finlayson 2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140616, Chlorpyrifos
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
258346 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chlorpyrifos. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The saltwater criterion continuous concentration to protect aquatic organisms is 0.009 ug/L (Siepmann and Finlayson 2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
%; PADDING-LEFT: 0%; FONT-WEIGHT: bold; PADDING-BOTTOM: 3px; WIDTH: 100%; text-align: left; PADDING-TOP: 3px; font-smooth: always">Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
258389 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chlorpyrifos. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The saltwater criterion continuous concentration to protect aquatic organisms is 0.009 ug/L (Siepmann and Finlayson 2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140616, Chlorpyrifos
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
258387 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chlorpyrifos. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The saltwater criterion continuous concentration to protect aquatic organisms is 0.009 ug/L (Siepmann and Finlayson 2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140616, Chlorpyrifos
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
258346 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chlorpyrifos. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The saltwater criterion continuous concentration to protect aquatic organisms is 0.009 ug/L (Siepmann and Finlayson 2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140617 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Copper |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Copper |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140617, Copper
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
259324 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Copper |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved copper criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 3.1 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-10-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140617, Copper
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
259192 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Copper |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved copper criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 3.1 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140617, Copper
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
258870 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Copper |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-10-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140617, Copper
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
259192 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Copper |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved copper criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 3.1 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140617, Copper
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
258870 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Copper |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved copper criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 3.1 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140617, Copper
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
258914 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Copper |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved copper criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 3.1 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140617, Copper
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
258916 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Copper |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved copper criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 3.1 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
eft" valign="top" width="67%">Water
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved copper criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 3.1 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140617, Copper
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
258914 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Copper |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved copper criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 3.1 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140617, Copper
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
258916 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Copper |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved copper criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 3.1 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140641 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140641, Cypermethrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
259721 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The genus mean acute value for a grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio) of 0.016 ug/L (DFG 00-6, 2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic Life Criteria for Pyrethroid Insecticides (DFG Administrative Report 00-6, 2000)
|
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-11-22 to 2018-11-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140641 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140641, Cypermethrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
259721 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Cypermethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Cypermethrin. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The genus mean acute value for a grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio) of 0.016 ug/L (DFG 00-6, 2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic Life Criteria for Pyrethroid Insecticides (DFG Administrative Report 00-6, 2000)
|
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-11-22 to 2018-11-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
149385 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149385, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
259848 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for DDT(p,p'). Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The DDT(4,4') criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.001 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
149385 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149385, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
259848 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for DDT(p,p'). Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The DDT(4,4') criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.001 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149385, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
259796 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for DDT(p,p'). Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The DDT(4,4') criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.001 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149385, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
259953 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149385, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
259796 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for DDT(p,p'). Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The DDT(4,4') criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.001 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149385, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
259953 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for DDT(p,p'). Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The DDT(4,4') criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.001 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-05). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149385, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260004 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for DDT(p,p'). Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The DDT(4,4') criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.001 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149385, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
259941 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for DDT(p,p'). Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The DDT(4,4') criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.001 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for DDT(p,p'). Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The DDT(4,4') criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.001 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-05). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149385, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260004 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for DDT(p,p'). Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The DDT(4,4') criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.001 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149385, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
259941 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for DDT(p,p'). Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The DDT(4,4') criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.001 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140643 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Demeton |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140643, Demeton
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260217 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Demeton |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Demeton, Total. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria lists criterion continuous concentrations for Demeton to protect aquatic life in freshwater and saltwater is 0.1 ug/L. |
Guideline Referen
| |
DECISION ID |
140643 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Demeton |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140643, Demeton
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260217 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Demeton |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Demeton, Total. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria lists criterion continuous concentrations for Demeton to protect aquatic life in freshwater and saltwater is 0.1 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-29). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140643, Demeton
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260216 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Demeton |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Demeton, Total. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria lists criterion continuous concentrations for Demeton to protect aquatic life in freshwater and saltwater is 0.1 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-30). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140643, Demeton
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
|
| National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-29). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140643, Demeton
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260216 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Demeton |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Demeton, Total. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria lists criterion continuous concentrations for Demeton to protect aquatic life in freshwater and saltwater is 0.1 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-30). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140643, Demeton
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260141 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Demeton |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Demeton, Total. Although a total of 6 samples were collected, 4 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria lists criterion continuous concentrations for Demeton to protect aquatic life in freshwater and saltwater is 0.1 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-05). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140643, Demeton
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260123 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Demeton |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Demeton, Total. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria lists criterion continuous concentrations for Demeton to protect aquatic life in freshwater and saltwater is 0.1 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-28). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140643, Demeton
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260218 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Demeton |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Demeton, Total. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria lists criterion continuous concentrations for Demeton to protect aquatic life in freshwater and saltwater is 0.1 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-04). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
valign="top" width="33%">LOE ID: |
260141 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Demeton |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Demeton, Total. Although a total of 6 samples were collected, 4 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria lists criterion continuous concentrations for Demeton to protect aquatic life in freshwater and saltwater is 0.1 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-05). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140643, Demeton
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260123 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Demeton |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Demeton, Total. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria lists criterion continuous concentrations for Demeton to protect aquatic life in freshwater and saltwater is 0.1 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-28). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140643, Demeton
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260218 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Demeton |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Demeton, Total. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
USEPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria lists criterion continuous concentrations for Demeton to protect aquatic life in freshwater and saltwater is 0.1 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-04). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140619 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Diazinon |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of the 16 samples exceed the CRITERIA.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.
This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of the 16 samples exceed the CRITERIA and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140619, Diazinon
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260149 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Diazinon |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Diazinon. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los
| |
DECISION ID |
140619 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Diazinon |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
1 line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 0 of the 16 samples exceed the CRITERIA.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category.
This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 0 of the 16 samples exceed the CRITERIA and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140619, Diazinon
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260149 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Diazinon |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Diazinon. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for diazinon to protect saltwater aquatic organisms is 0.82 ug/L (EPA-822-R-05-006). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Diazinon |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140619, Diazinon
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260317 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Diazinon |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Diazinon. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for diazinon to protect saltwater aquatic organisms is 0.82 ug/L (EPA-822-R-05-006). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Diazinon |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-08 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140619, Diazinon
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260264 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for diazinon to protect saltwater aquatic organisms is 0.82 ug/L (EPA-822-R-05-006). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Diazinon |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140619, Diazinon
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260317 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Diazinon |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Diazinon. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for diazinon to protect saltwater aquatic organisms is 0.82 ug/L (EPA-822-R-05-006). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Diazinon |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-08 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140619, Diazinon
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260264 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Diazinon |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
4 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Diazinon. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for diazinon to protect saltwater aquatic organisms is 0.82 ug/L (EPA-822-R-05-006). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Diazinon |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-02 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140619, Diazinon
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260299 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Diazinon |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Diazinon. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for diazinon to protect saltwater aquatic organisms is 0.82 ug/L (EPA-822-R-05-006). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Diazinon |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140619, Diazinon
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260109 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Diazinon |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Diazinon. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for diazinon to protect saltwater aquatic organisms is 0.82 ug/L (EPA-822-R-05-006). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Diazinon |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
" valign="top" width="33%">Pollutant: |
Diazinon |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
4 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Diazinon. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for diazinon to protect saltwater aquatic organisms is 0.82 ug/L (EPA-822-R-05-006). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Diazinon |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-02 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140619, Diazinon
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260299 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Diazinon |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Diazinon. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for diazinon to protect saltwater aquatic organisms is 0.82 ug/L (EPA-822-R-05-006). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Diazinon |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140619, Diazinon
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260109 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Diazinon |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Diazinon. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The chronic criterion for diazinon to protect saltwater aquatic organisms is 0.82 ug/L (EPA-822-R-05-006). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Diazinon |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140620 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Dieldrin |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Dieldrin |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140620, Dieldrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260367 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Dieldrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Dieldrin. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dieldrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0019 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140620, Dieldrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260547 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Dieldrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Dieldrin. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 5 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dieldrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0019 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140620, Dieldrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260629 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Dieldrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140620, Dieldrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260547 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Dieldrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Dieldrin. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 5 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dieldrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0019 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140620, Dieldrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260629 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Dieldrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Dieldrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dieldrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0019 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-11-22 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140620, Dieldrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260626 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Dieldrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Dieldrin. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dieldrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0019 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140620, Dieldrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260627 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Dieldrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Dieldrin. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dieldrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0019 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
eft" valign="top" width="67%">Water
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Dieldrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dieldrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0019 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-11-22 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140620, Dieldrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260626 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Dieldrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Dieldrin. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dieldrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0019 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140620, Dieldrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260627 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Dieldrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Dieldrin. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dieldrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0019 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140621 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Endrin |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Endrin |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140621, Endrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
261323 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Endrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Endrin. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0023 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140621, Endrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
261300 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Endrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Endrin. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0023 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140621, Endrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
261283 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Endrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140621, Endrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
261300 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Endrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Endrin. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0023 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140621, Endrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
261283 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Endrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Endrin. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 5 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0023 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140621, Endrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
261080 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Endrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Endrin. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0023 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140621, Endrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
261059 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Endrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Endrin. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0023 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
h="67%">Water
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Endrin. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 5 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0023 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140621, Endrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
261080 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Endrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Endrin. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0023 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140621, Endrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
261059 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Endrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Endrin. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endrin criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0023 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140623 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Heptachlor |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140623, Heptachlor
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
262097 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Heptachlor |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The heptachlor criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140623, Heptachlor
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
262034 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Heptachlor |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The heptachlor criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140623, Heptachlor
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
261976 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Heptachlor |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Mat
| |
DECISION ID |
140623 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Heptachlor |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140623, Heptachlor
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
262097 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Heptachlor |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The heptachlor criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline:
| Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The heptachlor criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140623, Heptachlor
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
261959 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Heptachlor |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 5 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The heptachlor criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140623, Heptachlor
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
261911 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Heptachlor |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The heptachlor criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
td>
| |
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140623, Heptachlor
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
262034 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Heptachlor |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The heptachlor criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140623, Heptachlor
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
261976 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Heptachlor |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The heptachlor criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140623, Heptachlor
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
261959 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Heptachlor |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 5 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The heptachlor criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140623, Heptachlor
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
261911 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Heptachlor |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The heptachlor criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140624 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Heptachlor epoxide |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140624, Heptachlor epoxide
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
262456 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Heptachlor epoxide |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor Epoxide. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The heptachlor epoxide criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140624, Heptachlor epoxide
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
262455 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Heptachlor epoxide |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor Epoxide. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The heptachlor epoxide criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140624, Heptachlor epoxide
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
262359 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Heptachlor epoxide |
| LOE Subgroup: |
|
| |
DECISION ID |
140624 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Heptachlor epoxide |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140624, Heptachlor epoxide
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
262456 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Heptachlor epoxide |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor Epoxide. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The heptachlor epoxide criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor Epoxide. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The heptachlor epoxide criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140624, Heptachlor epoxide
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
261923 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Heptachlor epoxide |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor Epoxide. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 5 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The heptachlor epoxide criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140624, Heptachlor epoxide
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
262490 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Heptachlor epoxide |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor Epoxide. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The heptachlor epoxide criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
" width="33%">Evaluation Guideline:
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140624, Heptachlor epoxide
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
262455 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Heptachlor epoxide |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor Epoxide. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The heptachlor epoxide criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140624, Heptachlor epoxide
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
262359 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Heptachlor epoxide |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor Epoxide. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The heptachlor epoxide criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140624, Heptachlor epoxide
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
261923 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Heptachlor epoxide |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor Epoxide. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 5 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The heptachlor epoxide criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140624, Heptachlor epoxide
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
262490 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Heptachlor epoxide |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Heptachlor Epoxide. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The heptachlor epoxide criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0036 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140625 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Lead |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140625, Lead
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263139 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Lead |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved lead criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 8.1 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140625, Lead
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263072 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Lead |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved lead criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 8.1 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140625, Lead
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
262991 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Lead |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
|
|
| |
DECISION ID |
140625 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Lead |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140625, Lead
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263139 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Lead |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved lead criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 8.1 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 "33%">Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved lead criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 8.1 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-08 and 2018-10-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140625, Lead
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263007 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Lead |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved lead criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 8.1 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140625, Lead
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263033 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Lead |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved lead criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 8.1 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
(Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal).
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140625, Lead
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263072 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Lead |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved lead criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 8.1 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140625, Lead
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
262991 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Lead |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
|
|
| |
DECISION ID |
140626 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH) |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140626, Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
262029 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
4 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for HCH, gamma-. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The gamma-BHC (Lindane) criterion maximum concentration (expressed as a 1-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.08 ug/L. The criterion of 0.16 ug/L provided in the California Toxics Rule is an instantaneous maximum concentration and was divided by 2 in order to better represent a criterion maximum concentration (CMC) value as specified in footnote (g) of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule (2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-05). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
"33%">Data and Information Type:
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved lead criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 8.1 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-08 and 2018-10-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140625, Lead
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263007 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Lead |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved lead criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 8.1 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140625, Lead
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263033 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Lead |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved lead criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 8.1 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140626 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH) |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140626, Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
262029 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Lindane/gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane (gamma-HCH) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
4 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for HCH, gamma-. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The gamma-BHC (Lindane) criterion maximum concentration (expressed as a 1-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.08 ug/L. The criterion of 0.16 ug/L provided in the California Toxics Rule is an instantaneous maximum concentration and was divided by 2 in order to better represent a criterion maximum concentration (CMC) value as specified in footnote (g) of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule (2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-05). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
149386 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Mercury |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149386, Mercury
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263180 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Mercury |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Mercury. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria Continuous Concentration (4-day average concentrations) for saltwater aquatic organisms exposure to total mercury is 0.94 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recom
| |
DECISION ID |
149386 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Mercury |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149386, Mercury
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263180 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Mercury |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Mercury. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria Continuous Concentration (4-day average concentrations) for saltwater aquatic organisms exposure to total mercury is 0.94 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149386, Mercury
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263358 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Mercury |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Mercury. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria Continuous Concentration (4-day average concentrations) for saltwater aquatic organisms exposure to total mercury is 0.94 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149386, Mercury
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263259 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Mercury |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149386, Mercury
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263358 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Mercury |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Mercury. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria Continuous Concentration (4-day average concentrations) for saltwater aquatic organisms exposure to total mercury is 0.94 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149386, Mercury
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263259 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Mercury |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Mercury. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria Continuous Concentration (4-day average concentrations) for saltwater aquatic organisms exposure to total mercury is 0.94 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-08 and 2018-10-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149386, Mercury
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263238 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Mercury |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Mercury. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria Continuous Concentration (4-day average concentrations) for saltwater aquatic organisms exposure to total mercury is 0.94 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149386, Mercury
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263228 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Mercury |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Mercury. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria Continuous Concentration (4-day average concentrations) for saltwater aquatic organisms exposure to total mercury is 0.94 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
ft" valign="top" width="67%">Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Mercury. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria Continuous Concentration (4-day average concentrations) for saltwater aquatic organisms exposure to total mercury is 0.94 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-08 and 2018-10-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149386, Mercury
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263238 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Mercury |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Mercury. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria Continuous Concentration (4-day average concentrations) for saltwater aquatic organisms exposure to total mercury is 0.94 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149386, Mercury
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263228 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Mercury |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Mercury. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria Continuous Concentration (4-day average concentrations) for saltwater aquatic organisms exposure to total mercury is 0.94 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140628 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Methoxychlor |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140628, Methoxychlor
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263649 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Methoxychlor |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
4 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Methoxychlor. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA national ambient water quality criterion for saltwater aquatic life Criterion Continuous Concentration (CCC) expressed as a 4-day average for methoxychlor is 0.03 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-05). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140628 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Methoxychlor |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140628, Methoxychlor
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263649 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Methoxychlor |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
4 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Methoxychlor. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: Surface waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts that adversely affect any designated beneficial use. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA national ambient water quality criterion for saltwater aquatic life Criterion Continuous Concentration (CCC) expressed as a 4-day average for methoxychlor is 0.03 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-05). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140629 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Mirex |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140629, Mirex
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263499 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Mirex |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Mirex. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 5 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA national recommended criterion continuous concentration for mirex for the protection of saltwater aquatic life is 0.001 µg/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140629, Mirex
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263520 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Mirex |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Mirex. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA national recommended criterion continuous concentration for mirex for the protection of saltwater aquatic life is 0.001 µg/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140629, Mirex
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal<
| |
DECISION ID |
140629 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Mirex |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140629, Mirex
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263499 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Mirex |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Mirex. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 5 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA national recommended criterion continuous concentration for mirex for the protection of saltwater aquatic life is 0.001 µg/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140629, Mirex
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263520 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Mirex |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Mirex. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA national recommended criterion continuous concentration for mirex for the protection of saltwater aquatic life is 0.001 µg/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140629, Mirex
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263570 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Mirex |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Mirex. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA national recommended criterion continuous concentration for mirex for the protection of saltwater aquatic life is 0.001 µg/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140629, Mirex
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263662 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Mirex |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Mirex. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263570 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Mirex |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Mirex. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA national recommended criterion continuous concentration for mirex for the protection of saltwater aquatic life is 0.001 µg/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140629, Mirex
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263662 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Mirex |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Mirex. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA national recommended criterion continuous concentration for mirex for the protection of saltwater aquatic life is 0.001 µg/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140629, Mirex
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263480 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Mirex |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Mirex. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA national recommended criterion continuous concentration for mirex for the protection of saltwater aquatic life is 0.001 µg/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
td> |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA national recommended criterion continuous concentration for mirex for the protection of saltwater aquatic life is 0.001 µg/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140629, Mirex
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263480 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Mirex |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Mirex. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA national recommended criterion continuous concentration for mirex for the protection of saltwater aquatic life is 0.001 µg/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140630 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nickel |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nickel |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140630, Nickel
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
264051 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nickel |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved nickel criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 8.2 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140630, Nickel
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263786 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nickel |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved nickel criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 8.2 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140630, Nickel
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263986 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nickel |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140630, Nickel
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263786 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nickel |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved nickel criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 8.2 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140630, Nickel
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263986 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nickel |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved nickel criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 8.2 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140630, Nickel
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
264095 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nickel |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved nickel criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 8.2 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140630, Nickel
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
264096 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nickel |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved nickel criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 8.2 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-08 and 2018-10-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
tr>
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved nickel criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 8.2 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140630, Nickel
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
264095 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nickel |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved nickel criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 8.2 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140630, Nickel
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
264096 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nickel |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved nickel criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 8.2 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-08 and 2018-10-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
149387 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrate |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149387, Nitrogen, Nitrate
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302315 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrate |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (page 3-34) states that: Waters shall not exceed 10 mg/L as nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
|
| |
DECISION ID |
149387 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrate |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149387, Nitrogen, Nitrate
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302315 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrate |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (page 3-34) states that: Waters shall not exceed 10 mg/L as nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149387, Nitrogen, Nitrate
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302380 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrate |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (page 3-34) states that: Waters shall not exceed 10 mg/L as nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-08 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149387, Nitrogen, Nitrate
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302248 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrate |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (page 3-34) states that: Waters shall not exceed 10 mg/L as nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149387, Nitrogen, Nitrate
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302320 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrate |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (page 3-34) states that: Waters shall not exceed 10 mg/L as nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149387, Nitrogen, Nitrate
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302446 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrate |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (page 3-34) states that: Waters shall not exceed 10 mg/L as nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
">The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-11-29
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149387, Nitrogen, Nitrate
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302380 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrate |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (page 3-34) states that: Waters shall not exceed 10 mg/L as nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-08 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149387, Nitrogen, Nitrate
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302248 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrate |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (page 3-34) states that: Waters shall not exceed 10 mg/L as nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149387, Nitrogen, Nitrate
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302320 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrate |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (page 3-34) states that: Waters shall not exceed 10 mg/L as nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149387, Nitrogen, Nitrate
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302446 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrate |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (page 3-34) states that: Waters shall not exceed 10 mg/L as nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
151955 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
Ten lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List.
This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 4 of 54 samples exceeded the objective and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151955, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
307789 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (page 3-39) states that: At a minimum (see specifics below), the mean annual dissolved oxygen concentration of all waters shall be greater than 7 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-29 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151955, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
308512 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (page 3-39) states that: At a minimum (see specifics below), the mean annual dissolved oxygen concentration of all waters shall be greater than 7 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-29 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151955, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
308391 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Ha
| |
DECISION ID |
151955 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
Ten lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List.
This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 4 of 54 samples exceeded the objective and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151955, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
307789 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (page 3-39) states that: At a minimum (see specifics below), the mean annual dissolved oxygen concentration of all waters shall be greater than 7 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
37 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 37 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: At a minimum... no single determination shall be less than 5.0 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-06-23 and 2019-04-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151955, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
308172 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: At a minimum... no single determination shall be less than 5.0 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-22 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151955, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
307790 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: At a minimum... no single determination shall be less than 5.0 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-22 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151955, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
308379 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: At a minimum... no single determination shall be less than 5.0 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-06-23 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151955, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
307793 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: At a minimum... no single determination shall be less than 5.0 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-22 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151955, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
307788 |
| |
|
| | |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-29 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151955, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
308512 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (page 3-39) states that: At a minimum (see specifics below), the mean annual dissolved oxygen concentration of all waters shall be greater than 7 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-29 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151955, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
308391 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Han="top" width="33%">Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (page 3-39) states that: At a minimum (see specifics below), the mean annual dissolved oxygen concentration of all waters shall be greater than 7 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-29 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151955, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
308265 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (page 3-39) states that: At a minimum (see specifics below), the mean annual dissolved oxygen concentration of all waters shall be greater than 7 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-29 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151955, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
307965 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (page 3-39) states that: At a minimum (see specifics below), the mean annual dissolved oxygen concentration of all waters shall be greater than 7 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-12-03 and 2019-04-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
bitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
37 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 37 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: At a minimum... no single determination shall be less than 5.0 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-06-23 and 2019-04-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151955, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
308172 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: At a minimum... no single determination shall be less than 5.0 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-22 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151955, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
307790 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: At a minimum... no single determination shall be less than 5.0 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-22 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151955, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
308379 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
|
|
| |
DECISION ID |
140635 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140635, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
264459 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls). Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The PCB, total aroclors criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.03 ug/L. This value corresponds to the sum of aroclors 1242, 1254, 1221, 1232, 1248, 1260, and 1016 (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federawidth="33%">SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: At a minimum... no single determination shall be less than 5.0 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-06-23 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151955, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
307793 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: At a minimum... no single determination shall be less than 5.0 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-22 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151955, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
307788 |
| |
|
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140635, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
264541 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls). Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The PCB, total aroclors criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.03 ug/L. This value corresponds to the sum of aroclors 1242, 1254, 1221, 1232, 1248, 1260, and 1016 (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140635, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
264463 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls). Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The PCB, total aroclors criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.03 ug/L. This value corresponds to the sum of aroclors 1242, 1254, 1221, 1232, 1248, 1260, and 1016 (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-10-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140635, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
264576 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls). Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The PCB, total aroclors criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.03 ug/L. This value corresponds to the sum of aroclors 1242, 1254, 1221, 1232, 1248, 1260, and 1016 (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
n="top" width="33%">Pollutant:
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (page 3-39) states that: At a minimum (see specifics below), the mean annual dissolved oxygen concentration of all waters shall be greater than 7 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-29 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151955, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
308265 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (page 3-39) states that: At a minimum (see specifics below), the mean annual dissolved oxygen concentration of all waters shall be greater than 7 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-29 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151955, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
307965 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region (page 3-39) states that: At a minimum (see specifics below), the mean annual dissolved oxygen concentration of all waters shall be greater than 7 mg/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-12-03 and 2019-04-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140633 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Pentachlorophenol (PCP) |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140635 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140635, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
264459 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls). Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The PCB, total aroclors criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.03 ug/L. This value corresponds to the sum of aroclors 1242, 1254, 1221, 1232, 1248, 1260, and 1016 (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federa
| |
DECISION ID |
140636 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Selenium |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140636, Selenium
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
265987 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Selenium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Selenium. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved selenium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 71 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140635, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
264541 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls). Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The PCB, total aroclors criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.03 ug/L. This value corresponds to the sum of aroclors 1242, 1254, 1221, 1232, 1248, 1260, and 1016 (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140635, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
264463 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls). Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The PCB, total aroclors criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.03 ug/L. This value corresponds to the sum of aroclors 1242, 1254, 1221, 1232, 1248, 1260, and 1016 (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-10-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140635, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
264576 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls). Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The PCB, total aroclors criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.03 ug/L. This value corresponds to the sum of aroclors 1242, 1254, 1221, 1232, 1248, 1260, and 1016 (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140633 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Pentachlorophenol (PCP) |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
t" valign="top" width="67%">The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-08 and 2018-10-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140636, Selenium
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
266326 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Selenium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Selenium. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved selenium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 71 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140636, Selenium
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
266184 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Selenium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Selenium. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved selenium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 71 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140636, Selenium
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
266345 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Selenium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Selenium. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved selenium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 71 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140636, Selenium
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
265852 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Selenium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Selenium. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved selenium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 71 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140636 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Selenium |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140636, Selenium
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
265987 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Selenium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Selenium. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved selenium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 71 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-08 and 2018-10-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140636, Selenium
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
266326 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Selenium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Selenium. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved selenium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 71 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140636, Selenium
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
266184 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Selenium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| |
DECISION ID |
140637 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Silver |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140637, Silver
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
266518 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Silver |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Silver. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved silver criterion maximum concentration (CMC) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 1.9 ug/L. This criterion was divided by 2 in order to better represent a CMC value as specified in footnote g of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule, 2000. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| &nbs
|
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Selenium. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved selenium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 71 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140636, Selenium
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
266345 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Selenium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Selenium. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved selenium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 71 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140636, Selenium
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
265852 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Selenium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Selenium. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved selenium criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 71 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
p;
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-10-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140637, Silver
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
266474 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Silver |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Silver. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved silver criterion maximum concentration (CMC) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 1.9 ug/L. This criterion was divided by 2 in order to better represent a CMC value as specified in footnote g of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule, 2000. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140637, Silver
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
266511 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Silver |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Silver. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved silver criterion maximum concentration (CMC) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 1.9 ug/L. This criterion was divided by 2 in order to better represent a CMC value as specified in footnote g of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule, 2000. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140637, Silver
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
266412 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Silver |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Silver. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved silver criterion maximum concentration (CMC) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 1.9 ug/L. This criterion was divided by 2 in order to better represent a CMC value as specified in footnote g of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule, 2000. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140637, Silver
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
266393 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Silver |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Silver. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved silver criterion maximum concentration (CMC) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 1.9 ug/L. This criterion was divided by 2 in order to better represent a CMC value as specified in footnote g of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule, 2000. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140637 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Silver |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140637, Silver
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
266518 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Silver |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Silver. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved silver criterion maximum concentration (CMC) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 1.9 ug/L. This criterion was divided by 2 in order to better represent a CMC value as specified in footnote g of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule, 2000. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
&nbs
| |
DECISION ID |
140638 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxaphene |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140638, Toxaphene
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
267787 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxaphene |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Toxaphene. Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 4 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The toxaphene criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0002 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-10-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140637, Silver
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
266474 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Silver |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Silver. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved silver criterion maximum concentration (CMC) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 1.9 ug/L. This criterion was divided by 2 in order to better represent a CMC value as specified in footnote g of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule, 2000. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140637, Silver
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
266511 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Silver |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140638, Toxaphene
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
267686 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxaphene |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Toxaphene. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The toxaphene criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0002 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140638, Toxaphene
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
267861 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxaphene |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
LOE Subgroup:
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Silver. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved silver criterion maximum concentration (CMC) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 1.9 ug/L. This criterion was divided by 2 in order to better represent a CMC value as specified in footnote g of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule, 2000. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140637, Silver
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
266412 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Silver |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Silver. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved silver criterion maximum concentration (CMC) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 1.9 ug/L. This criterion was divided by 2 in order to better represent a CMC value as specified in footnote g of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule, 2000. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140637, Silver
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
266393 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Silver |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Silver. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved silver criterion maximum concentration (CMC) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 1.9 ug/L. This criterion was divided by 2 in order to better represent a CMC value as specified in footnote g of Table (b)(1) of the California Toxics Rule, 2000. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
td align="left" valign="top" width="67%">Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Toxaphene. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The toxaphene criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0002 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140638, Toxaphene
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
267674 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxaphene |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Toxaphene. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The toxaphene criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0002 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140638, Toxaphene
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
267839 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxaphene |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Toxaphene. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The toxaphene criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0002 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140638 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxaphene |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140638, Toxaphene
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
267787 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxaphene |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Toxaphene. Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 4 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The toxaphene criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0002 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140638, Toxaphene
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
267686 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxaphene |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Toxaphene. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The toxaphene criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0002 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140638, Toxaphene
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
267861 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxaphene |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
<
| |
DECISION ID |
140639 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Zinc |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140639, Zinc
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268351 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Zinc |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Zinc. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved zinc criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 81 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Toxaphene. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The toxaphene criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0002 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140638, Toxaphene
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
267674 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxaphene |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Toxaphene. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The toxaphene criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0002 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140638, Toxaphene
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
267839 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxaphene |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Toxaphene. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The toxaphene criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.0002 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
width="67%">The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140639, Zinc
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268303 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Zinc |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Zinc. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved zinc criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 81 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140639, Zinc
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268347 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Zinc |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Zinc. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved zinc criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 81 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140639, Zinc
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268336 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Zinc |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Zinc. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved zinc criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 81 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140639, Zinc
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268333 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Zinc |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Zinc. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved zinc criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 81 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-08 and 2018-10-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140639 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Zinc |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140639, Zinc
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268351 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Zinc |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Zinc. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved zinc criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 81 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140639, Zinc
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268303 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Zinc |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Zinc. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved zinc criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 81 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140639, Zinc
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268347 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Zinc |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
|
|
| |
DECISION ID |
140618 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1) |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140618, alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260875 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endosulfan I. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endosulfan I (alpha-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0087 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Zinc. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved zinc criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 81 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140639, Zinc
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268336 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Zinc |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Zinc. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved zinc criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 81 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-09 and 2018-10-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140639, Zinc
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268333 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Zinc |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Zinc. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved zinc criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saline water is 81 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-10-08 and 2018-10-08 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
r>
Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-28). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140618, alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260831 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endosulfan I. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endosulfan I (alpha-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0087 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-30). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140618, alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260830 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endosulfan I. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endosulfan I (alpha-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0087 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-29). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140618, alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260717 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endosulfan I. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endosulfan I (alpha-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0087 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-04). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140618, alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260920 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endosulfan I. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endosulfan I (alpha-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0087 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-05). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140618 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1) |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140618, alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260875 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endosulfan I. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endosulfan I (alpha-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0087 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-28). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140618, alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260831 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endosulfan I. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endosulfan I (alpha-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0087 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-30). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140618, alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260830 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix:
| |
DECISION ID |
140632 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2) |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140632, beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260838 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endosulfan II. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endosulfan II (beta-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0087 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endosulfan I. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endosulfan I (alpha-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0087 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-29). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140618, alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260717 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endosulfan I. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endosulfan I (alpha-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0087 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-04). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140618, alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260920 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
alpha-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 1) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endosulfan I. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endosulfan I (alpha-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0087 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-05). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-28). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140632, beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260745 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endosulfan II. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endosulfan II (beta-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0087 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-05). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140632, beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260772 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endosulfan II. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endosulfan II (beta-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0087 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-30). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140632, beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260771 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endosulfan II. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endosulfan II (beta-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0087 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-04). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140632, beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260768 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endosulfan II. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endosulfan II (beta-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0087 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-29). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140632 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2) |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140632, beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260838 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endosulfan II. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endosulfan II (beta-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0087 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-28). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140632, beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260745 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endosulfan II. Although a total of 5 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endosulfan II (beta-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0087 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-05). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2019-12-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140632, beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260772 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
| |
DECISION ID |
140634 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140634, pH
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
265396 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Los Angeles Basin: the pH for inland surface waters, bays, or estuaries shall not be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.5 as a result of waste discharges. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-29 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Condition
| Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endosulfan II. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endosulfan II (beta-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0087 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-30). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140632, beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260771 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endosulfan II. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endosulfan II (beta-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0087 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-04). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140632, beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2)
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
260768 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
beta-Endosulfan (Endosulfan 2) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Endosulfan II. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The endosulfan II (beta-endosulfan) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in saltwater is 0.0087 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-29). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
s:
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140634, pH
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
265252 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
15 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 15 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Los Angeles Basin: the pH for inland surface waters, bays, or estuaries shall not be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.5 as a result of waste discharges. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-06-29 and 2019-01-10 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140634, pH
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
265243 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Los Angeles Basin: the pH for inland surface waters, bays, or estuaries shall not be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.5 as a result of waste discharges. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-29 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140634, pH
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
265084 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Los Angeles Basin: the pH for inland surface waters, bays, or estuaries shall not be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.5 as a result of waste discharges. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-29 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140634, pH
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
265143 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Los Angeles Basin: the pH for inland surface waters, bays, or estuaries shall not be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.5 as a result of waste discharges. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-29 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140634 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| Final Listing Decision: |
Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140634, pH
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
265396 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Los Angeles Basin: the pH for inland surface waters, bays, or estuaries shall not be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.5 as a result of waste discharges. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-29 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140634, pH
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
265252 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
15 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 15 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Los Angeles Basin: the pH for inland surface waters, bays, or estuaries shall not be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.5 as a result of waste discharges. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-06-29 and 2019-01-10 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140634, pH
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
265243 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Los Angeles Basin: the pH for inland surface waters, bays, or estuaries shall not be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.5 as a result of waste discharges. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-05 (Oxn_CI-05_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-29 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140634, pH
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
265084 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Los Angeles Basin: the pH for inland surface waters, bays, or estuaries shall not be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.5 as a result of waste discharges. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-29 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140634, pH
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
265143 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Los Angeles Basin: the pH for inland surface waters, bays, or estuaries shall not be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.5 as a result of waste discharges. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-29 and 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140627 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Malathion |
| Final Listing Decision: |
List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Sources: |
A Source Unknown |
| TMDL Priority: |
Low |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
1 lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 2 of the 2samples exceed the CRITERIA.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List.
This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 2 of the 2samples exceed the CRITERIA and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140627, Malathion
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
262872 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Malathion |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Malathion. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA national ambient water quality criteria for saltwater aquatic life instantaneous maximum for malathion is 0.1 µg/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140627, Malathion
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263001 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Malathion |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Malathion. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA national ambient water quality criteria for saltwater aquatic life instantaneous maximum for malathion is 0.1 µg/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-28). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140627, Malathion
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263110 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Malathion |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Malathion. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA national ambient water quality criteria for saltwater aquatic life instantaneous maximum for malathion is 0.1 µg/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140627, Malathion
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263127 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Malathion |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Malathion. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA national ambient water quality criteria for saltwater aquatic life instantaneous maximum for malathion is 0.1 µg/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140627, Malathion
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263067 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Malathion |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Malathion. Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA national ambient water quality criteria for saltwater aquatic life instantaneous maximum for malathion is 0.1 µg/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-05). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140644 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
| Final Listing Decision: |
List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Sources: |
A Source Unknown |
| TMDL Priority: |
Low |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
1 lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 4 of 4 samples exceed the CRITERIA.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List.
This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 4 of 4 samples exceed the CRITERIA and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140644, Permethrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
264708 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Permethrin. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The interim criteria maximum concentration to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.001 ug/L (DFG 00-6, 2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic Life Criteria for Pyrethroid Insecticides (DFG Administrative Report 00-6, 2000)
|
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-04). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140644, Permethrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
264915 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The interim criteria maximum concentration to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.001 ug/L (DFG 00-6, 2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic Life Criteria for Pyrethroid Insecticides (DFG Administrative Report 00-6, 2000)
|
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140644, Permethrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
264746 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Permethrin. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The interim criteria maximum concentration to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.001 ug/L (DFG 00-6, 2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic Life Criteria for Pyrethroid Insecticides (DFG Administrative Report 00-6, 2000)
|
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-05). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140644, Permethrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
264879 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Permethrin. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The interim criteria maximum concentration to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.001 ug/L (DFG 00-6, 2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic Life Criteria for Pyrethroid Insecticides (DFG Administrative Report 00-6, 2000)
|
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-30). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140644, Permethrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
264762 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Permethrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The interim criteria maximum concentration to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.001 ug/L (DFG 00-6, 2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic Life Criteria for Pyrethroid Insecticides (DFG Administrative Report 00-6, 2000)
|
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-29). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140627 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Malathion |
| Final Listing Decision: |
List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Sources: |
A Source Unknown |
| TMDL Priority: |
Low |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
1 lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 2 of the 2samples exceed the CRITERIA.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List.
This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 2 of the 2samples exceed the CRITERIA and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140627, Malathion
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
262872 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Malathion |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Malathion. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA national ambient water quality criteria for saltwater aquatic life instantaneous maximum for malathion is 0.1 µg/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-30 (Oxn_CI-30_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140627, Malathion
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263001 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Malathion |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Malathion. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA national ambient water quality criteria for saltwater aquatic life instantaneous maximum for malathion is 0.1 µg/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-28). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140627, Malathion
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263110 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Malathion |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Malathion. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA national ambient water quality criteria for saltwater aquatic life instantaneous maximum for malathion is 0.1 µg/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-29 (Oxn_CI-29_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140627, Malathion
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263127 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Malathion |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Malathion. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA national ambient water quality criteria for saltwater aquatic life instantaneous maximum for malathion is 0.1 µg/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-04 (Oxn_CI-04_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140627, Malathion
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
263067 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Malathion |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Malathion. Although a total of 4 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The USEPA national ambient water quality criteria for saltwater aquatic life instantaneous maximum for malathion is 0.1 µg/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-05). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
| |
DECISION ID |
140644 |
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
| Final Listing Decision: |
List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list) |
| Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision: |
New Decision |
| Revision Status |
Revised |
| Sources: |
A Source Unknown |
| TMDL Priority: |
Low |
| Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution: |
Pollutant |
| |
| Regional Board Conclusion: |
This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status.
1 lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. 4 of 4 samples exceed the CRITERIA.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List.
This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 4 of 4 samples exceed the CRITERIA and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met. |
| |
| Regional Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem. |
| |
| State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation: |
|
| |
| State Board Decision Recommendation: |
After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board. |
| |
| Listing Extent: |
|
| |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140644, Permethrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
264708 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Permethrin. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The interim criteria maximum concentration to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.001 ug/L (DFG 00-6, 2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic Life Criteria for Pyrethroid Insecticides (DFG Administrative Report 00-6, 2000)
|
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-04). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-08 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140644, Permethrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
264915 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Permethrin. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 3 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The interim criteria maximum concentration to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.001 ug/L (DFG 00-6, 2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic Life Criteria for Pyrethroid Insecticides (DFG Administrative Report 00-6, 2000)
|
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: Oxn_CI-28 (Oxn_CI-28_Edison Canal). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140644, Permethrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
264746 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Permethrin. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The interim criteria maximum concentration to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.001 ug/L (DFG 00-6, 2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic Life Criteria for Pyrethroid Insecticides (DFG Administrative Report 00-6, 2000)
|
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-05). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-02 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140644, Permethrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
264879 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Permethrin. Although a total of 3 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The interim criteria maximum concentration to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.001 ug/L (DFG 00-6, 2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic Life Criteria for Pyrethroid Insecticides (DFG Administrative Report 00-6, 2000)
|
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-30). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 140644, Permethrin
|
Region 4 |
Edison Canal |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
264762 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Permethrin |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Marine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Channel Island Harbor Nutrient Study data for Edison Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Permethrin. Although a total of 2 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 4. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region states that: No individual pesticide or combination of pesticides shall be present in concentrations that adversely affect beneficial uses. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The interim criteria maximum concentration to protect aquatic life in saline water is 0.001 ug/L (DFG 00-6, 2000). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Aquatic Life Criteria for Pyrethroid Insecticides (DFG Administrative Report 00-6, 2000)
|
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (Oxn_CI-29). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2018-10-09 to 2018-11-29 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Aquatic Bioassay & Consulting. 2020. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR NUTRIENT SOURCES & SINKS STUDY |
| |