California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year 2017-18
ENFORCE: NPDES WASTEWATER
ALL NPDES WASTEWATER FACILITIES
MESSAGE:
The number of documented MMP violations in 2017 rose from 2016.
VIOLATIONS SUBJECT TO MANDATORY MINIMUM PENALTIES, TRENDS 2017-2018
KEY STATISTICS FOR 2015 - 2017 | |
Total Number of Violations in 2017: | 1,292 |
Total Number of Violations in 2016: | 863 |
Total Number of Violations in 2015: | 1,129 |
MEASUREMENTS - Data last updated on: October 30, 2018
Total number of documented MMP violations:
Regional Offices |
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | Regional Office Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 193 | 218 | 129 | 135 | 173 | 205 | 157 | 148 | 413 | 142 | 126 | 50 | 69 | 96 | 194 | 117 | 101 | 148 | 2,814 |
2 | 323 | 285 | 154 | 123 | 169 | 117 | 203 | 140 | 107 | 30 | 61 | 90 | 438 | 260 | 115 | 92 | 75 | 64 | 2,846 |
3 | 161 | 124 | 79 | 49 | 92 | 61 | 51 | 57 | 57 | 83 | 77 | 90 | 116 | 180 | 155 | 77 | 54 | 84 | 1,647 |
4 | 777 | 986 | 1,157 | 1,309 | 374 | 491 | 971 | 731 | 780 | 709 | 656 | 702 | 487 | 252 | 384 | 485 | 371 | 461 | 12,083 |
5F | 69 | 31 | 270 | 222 | 126 | 130 | 164 | 160 | 164 | 92 | 37 | 28 | 28 | 56 | 222 | 27 | 1 | 34 | 1,861 |
5R | 35 | 7 | 14 | 17 | 30 | 12 | 28 | 38 | 7 | 90 | 89 | 112 | 104 | 122 | 29 | 23 | 23 | 45 | 825 |
5S | 371 | 352 | 551 | 336 | 616 | 879 | 1,073 | 1,204 | 534 | 387 | 1,046 | 904 | 191 | 203 | 94 | 195 | 104 | 170 | 9,210 |
6A | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 26 | 93 | 12 | 11 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 143 |
6B | - | - | 1 | 2 | 2 | - | 102 | 22 | 39 | 5 | 21 | 19 | - | 4 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 84 | 319 |
7 | 60 | 48 | 96 | 137 | 80 | 85 | 148 | 54 | 153 | 34 | 75 | 84 | 19 | 52 | 88 | 64 | 66 | 105 | 1,448 |
8 | 318 | 147 | 63 | 39 | 99 | 170 | 157 | 93 | 122 | 31 | 57 | 28 | 32 | 32 | 19 | 31 | 47 | 69 | 1,554 |
9 | 26 | 29 | 18 | 17 | 414 | 65 | 90 | 104 | 108 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 52 | 4 | 5 | 12 | 12 | 28 | 994 |
TOTAL | 2,333 | 2,227 | 2,532 | 2,386 | 2,175 | 2,215 | 3,144 | 2,751 | 2,510 | 1,697 | 2,261 | 2,123 | 1,537 | 1,261 | 1,308 | 1,129 | 863 | 1,292 | 35,744 |
WHAT THE MEASURE IS SHOWING
The data shows MMP violations since 2000 by violation type. We see a variation through the years. There is significant increase in the count of violations in 2006 due to the greater emphasis on documentation of serious violations for late reports, especially within the Los Angeles Regional Water Board as a result of implementation of the statewide initiative for MMP enforcement. MMPs for late reports began in 2004 with the addition of section 13385.1. The graph also indicates a significant reduction in the number of reporting violations probably due to better compliance as a result of formal and informal actions and information provided to dischargers regarding mandatory minimum penalties for late reports. The data suggest an potential inconsistent documentation of reporting violations among regional boards.
WHY THIS MEASURE IS IMPORTANT
On January 1, 2000, new legislation (Senate Bill 709) required that certain permit violations under the Water Code be subject to mandatory minimum penalties (MMP). Mandatory penalty provisions are required by California Water Code section 13385(h) and (i) for specified violations of NPDES permits. For violations that are subject to those mandatory minimum penalties, the RWQCB must either assess an ACL for the mandatory minimum penalty or assess an ACL for a greater amount. California Water Code section 13385(h) requires that a mandatory minimum penalty of $3,000 be assessed by the RWQCB for each serious violation. The RWQCB is also required by California Water Code section 13385(i) to assess mandatory minimum penalties of $3,000 per non-serious violation, not counting the first three violations. Identification and documentation of violations is important to ensure that water quality is protected and that serious violations and those high priority violations receive an adequate enforcement response. Tracking violations and compliance rates over time is necessary to assess the effectiveness of the Water Boards enforcement policies and actions. For every enforcement action taken, the dischargers return to compliance should be tracked in the Water Board's enforcement database.
TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS
- Data Source: CIWQS Period.
- Unit of Measure: Number of Violations subject to mandatory minimum penalties. Occurring January 1, 2000 to date data extracted.
- Data Definitions: Violations with status "violation". Enforcement actions with status Active or Historical.
- References:
The Water Boards' NPDES Storm Water Program
Public Reports and Data
Report of the Statewide Initiative on Mandatory Minimum Penalty Enforcement
Mandatory Minimum Penalty Report
Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Information
The Water Boards' Enforcement Policy - US EPA Enforcement Metrics – Compliance Rates
GLOSSARY
- National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
- The NPDES permit program (Section 402 of the Clean Water Act) controls water pollution by regulating point sources that discharge pollutants into waters of the United States. Point sources are discrete conveyances such as pipes or man-made ditches. Individual homes that are connected to a municipal system, use a septic system, or do not have a surface discharge do not need an NPDES permit; however, industrial, municipal, and other facilities must obtain permits if their discharges go directly to surface waters. US EPA has approved the Water Board's program to issue NPDES permits.
- Mandatory Minimum Penalty (MMP)
- California Water Code sections 13385(h) and (i) and section 13385.1 require that mandatory minimum penalties be assessed for specified violations of NPDES permits. For violations that are subject to mandatory minimum penalties, the Water Boards must issue an ACL for at least the mandatory minimum penalty, which is $3,000.
- Serious Violation Subject to Mandatory Minimum Penalty (MMP)
- California Water Code section 13385(h) defines a serious violation as any waste discharge that exceeds the effluent limitation for a Group I pollutant by 40 percent or more, or a Group II pollutant by 20 percent or more. Group I and Group II pollutants are defined in Title 40 of the Federal Code of Regulations, Part 123.45. California Water Code section 13385.1 also defines a serious violation subject to MMP a failure to submit a compliance self-monitoring report for each complete 30-day period.
- Chronic Violation Subject to Mandatory Minimum Penalty (MMP)
- California Water Code section 13385(i) defines a chronic violation subject to mandatory minimum penalty as any waste discharge that exceeds effluent limitations four or more times in any period of six consecutive months.
- Mandatory Minimum Penalty (MMP) Report
- This report displays violations that require assessment of "Mandatory Minimum Penalties". This Fact Sheet provides further details about the report.
- Administrative Civil Liability (ACL) Action
- California Water Code sections 13323-13327 describe the process to be used to assess Administrative Civil Liabilities. Liabilities are an important part of the Water Boards enforcement authority.
- Court Order
- The Water Boards can refer violations to the state Attorney General for civil enforcement actions. The Water Boards can also request the appropriate county District Attorney or City Attorney seek criminal prosecution. A superior court may be requested to impose civil or criminal penalties.
- Expedited Payment Offer
- A conditional offer that provides a discharger with an opportunity to resolve any outstanding violations subject to mandatory minimum penalties by acknowledging them and providing full payment of the accrued mandatory penalties identified in the payment letter.
- Addressing Mandatory Minimum Penalty Violations
- Section VII of the Water Quality Enforcement Policy describes the process necessary to ensure that violations subject to mandatory minimum penalties are properly addressed. An MMP violation is considered addressed or in the process of being addressed once the enforcement procedures have been initiated.