Hearing Regarding Petition Requesting Changes in Water Rights of The Department of Water Resources and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation for the California WaterFix Project
Written Objections and Responses to Part 1B Cases-In-Chief
January 2017
- January 6, 2017 - California Department of Water Resources' Response to Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- January 6, 2017 - Snug Harbor Resort's Supplemental Response to California Department of Water Resources' Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- January 6, 2017 - Snug Harbor Resort's Response to California Department of Water Resources' Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- January 6, 2017 - Central Delta Water Agency, South Delta Water Agency, et al.'s Response to California Department of Water Resources' and San Luis and Delta-Mendota Water Authority's Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- January 6, 2017 - Sacramento Valley Water User's Response to California Department of Water Resources' Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- January 6, 2017 - Sacramento County Water Agency's Response to California Department of Water Resources' Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- January 6, 2017 - Save the California Delta Alliance, et al.'s Response to California Department of Water Resources' Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- January 6, 2017 - Restore the Delta's Response to California Department of Water Resources' and San Luis and Delta-Mendota Water Authority's Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- January 6, 2017 - Placer County Water Agency's Response to California Department of Water Resources' and San Luis and Delta-Mendota Water Authority's Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- January 6, 2017 - Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, et al.'s Response to California Department of Water Resources' and San Luis and Delta-Mendota Water Authority's Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- January 6, 2017 - North Delta Water Agency's Response to California Department of Water Resources' Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- January 6, 2017 - North Delta C.A.R.E.S's Response to California Department of Water Resources'' and San Luis and Delta-Mendota Water Authority's Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- January 6, 2017 - City of Folsom, City of Roseville, San Juan Water District and Sacramento Suburban Water District's Response to Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- January 6, 2017 - East Bay Municipal Utility District's Response to California Department of Water Resources' Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- January 6, 2017 - Deirdre Des Jardins' Notes on Final Exhibit Submission for Case-in-Chief
- January 6, 2017 - Deirdre Des Jardins' Response to San Luis and Delta-Mendota Water Authority's Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- January 6, 2017 - Deirdre Des Jardins' Supplemental Response to California Department of Water Resources' Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- January 6, 2017 - Brannan-Andrus Levee Maintenance District, et al.'s Response to California Department of Water Resources' Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- January 6, 2017 - County of San Joaquin, et al.'s and Local Agencies of the North Delta, et al.'s Response to San Luis and Delta-Mendota Water Authority's Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- January 6, 2017 - County of San Joaquin, et al.'s and Local Agencies of the North Delta, et al.'s Response to California Department of Water Resources' Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- January 6, 2017 - California Sportfishing Protection Alliance's Response to California Department of Water Resources' and San Luis and Delta-Mendota Water Authority's Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- January 6, 2017 - City of Stocktons Response to California Water Resources' Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- January 6, 2017 - City of Sacramento's Response to California Department of Water Resources' Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- January 6, 2017 - City of Antioch's Response to California Department of Water Resources' and San Luis and Delta-Mendota Water Authority's Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- January 6, 2017 - Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District, et al.'s Response to California Department of Water Resources' Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- January 6, 2017 - Clifton Court, L.P.'s Response to California Department of Water Resources' Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
December 2016
- December 30, 2016 - California Department of Water Resources' Objections to Exhibits Submitted into Evidence
- December 30, 2016 - San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority's Objections to Exhibits Submitted into Evidence
- December 29, 2016 - North Delta Water Agency's Response to San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and Westlands Water District's Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- December 29, 2016 - Sacramento Valley Group's Response to San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and Westlands Water District's Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- December 23, 2016 - Sacramento County Water Agency's Response to San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al.'s Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
- December 22, 2016 - Sacramento Valley Water Users' Response to San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al.'s Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence
November 2016
- November 22, 2016 - San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and Westlands Water District's Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence by East Bay Municipal Utility District (Group 15) and City of Stockton (Group 22)
- November 21, 2016 - Placer County Water Agency's Objection to San Luis Delta-Mendota Water Authority's Exhibit SLDMWA-4
- November 16, 2016 - San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and Westlands Water District’s Objections to Exhibits Submitted for Admission into Evidence by Groups 7 and 9
October 2016
- October 21, 2016 - Placer County Water Agency's Response
September 2016
- September 21, 2016 - Sacramento Valley Water User’s Objection to the Case-In-Chief Testimony Submitted by Westlands Water District
- September 21, 2016 - Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority and the North Delta Water Agency’s Joinder
- September 21, 2016 - City of Folsom, City of Roseville, Sacramento Suburban Water District, San Juan Water District and Yuba County Water Agency’s Joinder
- September 30, 2016 - Westland Water District's Response
- September 21, 2016 - Sacramento Valley Group and Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority’s Objection to the Case-in-Chief Testimony of the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance, South Delta Water Agency et al., Restore the Delta and Save the California Delta Alliance
- December 2, 2016 - Restore the Delta's Response
- September 21, 2016 - Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District and Biggs-West Gridley Water District’s
- September 21, 2016 - San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority’s Objections to Part 1B Parties’ Cases-In-Chief
- September 30, 2016 - Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District’s Responses
- September 30, 2016 - East Bay Municipal Utility District’s Response
- September 30, 2016 - County of San Joaquin, et al.’s Response
- September 30, 2016 - City of Antioch's Response
- October 19, 2016 - North Delta Water Agency's Response
- October 19, 2016 - Sacramento Valley Water Users' Response
- October 24, 2016 - Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District's Response
- November 2, 2016 - Local Agencies of the North Delta, et al.'s Response Local Agencies of the North Delta, et al.'s Declaration of Osha Meserve
- December 2, 2016 - Restore the Delta's Response
- September 21, 2016 - Westlands Water District’s Joinder
- September 21, 2016 - San Joaquin County Protestants, The North San Joaquin Water Conservation District, and the Local Agencies of the North Delta, et al.'s Join Objections to the Case-In-Chief Testimony Submitted by Westlands Water District and Joint Motion to Exclude the Westlands Water District Testimony
- September 21, 2016 - Central Delta Water Agency, South Delta Water Agency, et al.'s Joinder
- September 21, 2016 - Friends of the River, Sierra Club California, and the Planning and Conservation League’s Joinder
- September 21, 2016 - Central Delta Water Agency, South Delta Water Agency, et al.'s Joinder
- September 21, 2016 - California Department of Water Resources' (DWR) Objections to Protestants' Cases-In-Chief
- DWR's Master Objections to Protestants’ Cases-In-Chief Declaration Attesting to the Accuracy of Original Objections
- Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority’s Joinder
- December 12, 2016 - Deirdre Des Jardins' Response
- December 12, 2016 - Deirdre Des Jardins' Response to section "E"
- December 9, 2016 - Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, et al.'s Supplemental Response
- DWR's Objections to the City of Antioch
- October 31, 2016 - City of Antioch's Response
- September 30, 2016 - City of Antioch's Response
- DWR's Objection to the City of Brentwood
- October 19, 2016 - City of Brentwood's Response
- DWR's Objections to Clifton Court LP.
- September 30, 2016 - Clifton Court, L.P.’s Response
- DWR's Objections to CSPA, C-WIN and AquAlliance
- September 30, 2016 - California Sportfishing Protection Alliance, et al.'s Response
- DWR's Objections to Carmichael Water District
- DWR's Objections to Deirdre Des Jardins
- December 12, 2016 - Deirdre Des Jardins' Response
- DWR's Objections to Brannan-Andrus Levee Maintenance District, et al.
- DWR's Objections to the City of Folsom
- DWR's Objections to Biggs-West Gridley water District, Butte Water District, Richvale Irrigation District and Sutter Extension Water District
- DWR's Objections to Local Agencies of the North Delta, et al.
- DWR's Objections to North Delta Cares
- September 30, 2016 - North Delta C.A.R.E.S’s Response
- December 12, 2016 - North Delta Cares' Response
- DWR's Objections to Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations
- September 30, 2016 - Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations, et al.’s Response
- DWR's Objections to Placer County Water Agency
- DWR's Objections to the Save the California Delta Alliance, et al.
- September 30, 2016 - Save the California Delta Alliance, et al.'s Response
- DWR's Objections to Sacramento County Regional Sanitation District
- DWR's Objections to Sacramento Suburban Water District
- DWR's Objections to South Delta Water Agency, Central Delta Water Agency et al.
- South Delta Water Agency, Central Delta Water Agency et al.'s Response to Objections to Written Testimony and Exhibits
- September 30, 2016 - South Delta Water Agency, et al.'s Response
- DWR's Objections to Snug Harbor Resorts
- Snug Harbor Resorts, LLC.'s Opposition
- September 30, 2016 - Snug Harbor Resorts' Response
- DWR's Objections to San Juan Water District
- DWR's Objections to Sacramento Valley Group
- DWR's Objections to the City of Stockton
- City of Stockton's Response
- September 30, 2016 - City of Stockton's Response
- DWR's Objections to Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority
- September 21, 2016 - Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, et al's Objection to the Case-In-Chief Testimony Submitted by Westlands Water District
Water is a precious resource in California, and maintaining its quality is of utmost importance to safeguard the health of the public and the environment.